Bug 231779 - libsigc++ should BuildRequire gcc-c++
Summary: libsigc++ should BuildRequire gcc-c++
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: libsigc++   
(Show other bugs)
Version: 6
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Denis Leroy
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2007-03-11 17:24 UTC by Ian Pilcher
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:11 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-03-11 22:26:04 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Ian Pilcher 2007-03-11 17:24:12 UTC
Description of problem:
libsigc++ should BuildRequire gcc-c++

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
libsigc++-1.2.7-4.fc6.src.rpm

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1.  rpm -e gcc-c++ (if installed)
2.  rpmbuild -bb libsigc++.spec
  
Actual results:
configure script complains "your C++ compiler is not powerful enough"

Expected results:
RPM should complain of missing build-requirement -- gcc-c++

Additional info:

Comment 1 Denis Leroy 2007-03-11 22:26:04 UTC
According to Fedora spec guidelines, gcc-c++ is never used a BuildRequires
because it is part of the build roots used by our buildsystem.

Out of curiosity, are you still using libsigc++ (as opposed to the libsigc++20
2.0 API) ? i thought about End-Of-Lifeing that package before, but i'll keep it
around if i know people are still using it...

Comment 2 Ian Pilcher 2007-03-11 22:49:21 UTC
Whoops!  Didn't realize that.

I use libsigc++ for efax-gtk (not in Extras).  AFAIK, it doesn't support 2.0 yet.

Comment 3 Denis Leroy 2007-03-11 22:56:23 UTC
Didn't know about efax-gtk. You should contribute it to Extras!



Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.