Bug 234792 - Error for wireless request "Set Encode" (8B2A)
Summary: Error for wireless request "Set Encode" (8B2A)
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: xinetd   
(Show other bugs)
Version: 9
Hardware: i686
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jan Safranek
QA Contact: Brock Organ
Depends On:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2007-04-02 01:54 UTC by Eliezer E Chávez
Modified: 2008-05-30 07:39 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2008-05-30 07:39:15 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Eliezer E Chávez 2007-04-02 01:54:36 UTC
Description of problem:
Error for wireless request "Set Encode" (8B2A) :
    SET failed on device eth0 ; No such device.

Determining IP information for eth0... failed.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Linux horus 2.6.20-2925.5.fc7xen #1 SMP Thu Mar 22 13:51:38 EDT 2007 i686 i686
i386 GNU/Linux

How reproducible:

ifup eth0

Steps to Reproduce:
1. ifup eth0
Actual results:

Error for wireless request "Set Encode" (8B2A) :
    SET failed on device eth0 ; No such device.

Determining IP information for eth0... failed.

Expected results:

Work OK

Additional info:

I have an HP dv8275LA notebook, the Wireless Card is an Intel PRO/Wireless 3945

Thanks in advance

Comment 1 Jay Fenlason 2007-04-02 14:38:24 UTC
I think you have filed this bug against the wrong component.  Xinetd has 
nothing to do with wireless networking.  Please reassign this bug to the 
correct component.

Comment 2 Eliezer E Chávez 2007-04-02 15:13:56 UTC
What is the right component?

Thanks in advance,


Comment 3 Jay Fenlason 2007-04-02 15:19:39 UTC
I have no idea.  I know next to nothing about wireless networking under recent 
Fedoras (my only wireless card is in a RHEL-4 laptop).  You don't provide any 
information about how you configured your eth0, which makes even wild guessing 

Comment 4 Jan Safranek 2008-01-31 14:16:31 UTC
Sorry we did not provide enough info to track this bug... Is the bug still
reproducible? If so, please assign it to kernel - that's the one to blame here.

Comment 5 Bug Zapper 2008-05-14 02:43:17 UTC
Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA.
More information and reason for this action is here:

Comment 6 Jan Safranek 2008-05-30 07:39:15 UTC
Closing, the reporter failed to provide actual status of the bug.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.