Bug 235365 - Channel bonding with network traffic results in about 50% packet loss
Channel bonding with network traffic results in about 50% packet loss
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 235379
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4
Classification: Red Hat
Component: kernel (Show other bugs)
4.5
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Andy Gospodarek
Martin Jenner
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2007-04-05 09:32 EDT by Hemanth V
Modified: 2014-06-29 18:58 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-04-05 16:01:28 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)
output of ping <ipaddress> 1>error (2.81 KB, text/plain)
2007-04-05 09:32 EDT, Hemanth V
no flags Details

  None (edit)
Description Hemanth V 2007-04-05 09:32:18 EDT
Description of problem:
Channel bonding with network traffic results in about 50% packet loss.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
kernel-2.6.9-51.ELsmp
bonding - 2.6.3-rh


How reproducible:
 Everytime.


Steps to Reproduce:
1.Install RHEL4.5 Snapshot4 x86_64 on PE1955
2. Configure bonding in balance-rr, balance-alb/tlb etc.
3. ping <ipaddress> 
4. Do a failover and it results in about 50% packet loss 

Actual results:
50% packet loss

Expected result:
0% packet loss

Additional info: 
This behaviour is also observed in balance-alb and balance-tlb
Comment 1 Hemanth V 2007-04-05 09:32:18 EDT
Created attachment 151758 [details]
output of ping <ipaddress>   1>error
Comment 2 Andy Gospodarek 2007-04-05 10:02:23 EDT
Can you tell me a little more about your network setup (both host running
bonding and host you are pinging)?  
Comment 3 Andy Gospodarek 2007-04-05 10:02:52 EDT
Oh yeah, and if you can send me a sysreport of your system that would be nice
too.  Thanks.
Comment 4 Andy Gospodarek 2007-04-05 16:01:28 EDT

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 235379 ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.