Bug 235947 - Good: libode.a is required to build a new rpm
Good: libode.a is required to build a new rpm
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: ode (Show other bugs)
6
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Hans de Goede
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2007-04-10 18:53 EDT by Benoît Marcelin
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:12 EST (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-04-11 03:16:13 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Benoît Marcelin 2007-04-10 18:53:09 EDT
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; fr-FR; rv:1.8.1.3) Gecko/20070320 Firefox/2.0.0.3

Description of problem:
I want to build a package, the build need libode.a (who are deleted in the spec of ode)

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
0.7-2

How reproducible:
Always


Steps to Reproduce:
1.rpmbuild -ba rpmbuild/SPEC/.....spec
2.
3.

Actual Results:


Expected Results:


Additional info:
Comment 1 Christian Iseli 2007-04-11 02:45:10 EDT
Two questions:
1. why did you add me to the CC of this bug ?
2. what makes you think you absolutely need the static library ?
Comment 2 Hans de Goede 2007-04-11 03:16:13 EDT
We (Fedora) try to avoid static libs as much as possible. We do this up to the
point of not even shipping them, this is a feature not a bug.

Simply replace /usr/lib/libode.a with -lode in the Makefile should do the trick.

Also next time please provide some usefull information, like a link to the SRPM
for the package you are trying to build, IOW exact reproduction instructions for
you're problem. Maybe then I could have been of more help, but with the very
small amount of info currently provided I can only say this is not a bug, and
advice you to use -lode instead of trying to hardcode a path to libode.a in the
makefile.

Closing ...
Comment 3 Benoît Marcelin 2007-04-11 07:29:39 EDT
To answer to Christian Iseli :
1 - because you are the latest packager of ode (on the changelog)
2 - during the %build of the rpm he what's two no-existing static library
(libode.a and an other) to make an object : gcc: /usr/lib64/libode.a: No such
file or directory

So I will try to do than Hans de Goede tell me

Sorry for the inconvenience and my poor english.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.