Bug 241855 - a2ps process postscript as text
Summary: a2ps process postscript as text
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: a2ps (Show other bugs)
(Show other bugs)
Version: 5.0
Hardware: All Linux
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Tim Waugh
QA Contact:
Keywords: Reopened
Depends On:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2007-05-31 07:06 UTC by Patrice Dumas
Modified: 2013-04-12 19:09 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version: RHBA-2008-0067
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2008-01-23 14:12:42 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

External Trackers
Tracker ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2008:0067 normal SHIPPED_LIVE a2ps bug fix update 2008-01-23 14:12:40 UTC

Description Patrice Dumas 2007-05-31 07:06:49 UTC
Description of problem:

On a centos5, but I guess it is the same in RHEL and it was
present in fedora before the review. A postscript file is processed
just like if it was text. This issue was fixed in fedora during
the review by adding a Buildrequires, like psutils. Since it is
too complicated to find the a2ps spec file for RHEL I couldn't
really compare, but by adjusting buildrequires and rebuilding I think
this issue should be solved.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

Comment 2 RHEL Product and Program Management 2007-06-05 20:26:31 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for
inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux release.  Since this
bugzilla is in a component that is not approved for the current
release, it has been closed with resolution deferred.  You may
reopen this bugzilla for consideration in the next release.

Comment 3 Patrice Dumas 2007-06-05 20:47:51 UTC
What about


And I checked that the BuildRequires is missing in the srpm.

I guess that the strange Comment #2 is done by something automatic
(no human being really says such things, isn't it ;-).
I may be missing something, sure, but you'd better have a look.

Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2008-01-23 14:12:42 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.