Bug 241855 - a2ps process postscript as text
a2ps process postscript as text
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: a2ps (Show other bugs)
5.0
All Linux
low Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Tim Waugh
: Reopened
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2007-05-31 03:06 EDT by Patrice Dumas
Modified: 2013-04-12 15:09 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: RHBA-2008-0067
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-01-23 09:12:42 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Patrice Dumas 2007-05-31 03:06:49 EDT
Description of problem:

On a centos5, but I guess it is the same in RHEL and it was
present in fedora before the review. A postscript file is processed
just like if it was text. This issue was fixed in fedora during
the review by adding a Buildrequires, like psutils. Since it is
too complicated to find the a2ps spec file for RHEL I couldn't
really compare, but by adjusting buildrequires and rebuilding I think
this issue should be solved.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:
Comment 2 RHEL Product and Program Management 2007-06-05 16:26:31 EDT
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for
inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux release.  Since this
bugzilla is in a component that is not approved for the current
release, it has been closed with resolution deferred.  You may
reopen this bugzilla for consideration in the next release.
Comment 3 Patrice Dumas 2007-06-05 16:47:51 EDT
What about

ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Server/en/os/SRPMS/a2ps-4.13b-57.1.el5.src.rpm

And I checked that the BuildRequires is missing in the srpm.

I guess that the strange Comment #2 is done by something automatic
(no human being really says such things, isn't it ;-).
I may be missing something, sure, but you'd better have a look.
Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2008-01-23 09:12:42 EST
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0067.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.