Bug 243975 - (c2070-review) Review Request: c2070 - Converts bitcmyk data to Lexmark 2070 printer language
Review Request: c2070 - Converts bitcmyk data to Lexmark 2070 printer language
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review (Show other bugs)
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Marek Mahut
Fedora Package Reviews List
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2007-06-13 02:04 EDT by Lubomir Kundrak
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:12 EST (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2007-07-04 07:18:44 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
mmahut: fedora‑review+
wtogami: fedora‑cvs+

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Lubomir Kundrak 2007-06-13 02:04:59 EDT
Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/SPECS/c2070.spec
SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/SRPMS/c2070-0.99-1.src.rpm
Description: Converts bitcmyk data to Lexmark 2070 printer language

This is a filter to convert bitcmyk data such as produced by ghostscript to
the printer language of Lexmark 2070 printers. It is meant to be used
by the PostScript Description files of the drivers from the foomatic package.

Note: This package is a part of the ongoing effort to extend hardware
support by fixing the foomatic drivers that actually refer to external

Please note that this package is kind of orphaned -- original upstream web
site and mirror are no longer reachable. Even though the package is in solid
and functional state and widely used also by other operating system vendors
to maintain hardware compatibility.
Comment 1 Lubomir Kundrak 2007-06-20 16:35:14 EDT
New Package CVS Request
Package Name: c2070
Short Description: Converts bitcmyk data to Lexmark 2070 printer language
Owners: lkundrak@redhat.com
Branches: FC-6 F-7
Comment 2 Josh Boyer 2007-06-20 16:52:15 EDT
this hasn't been properly reviewed yet
Comment 3 Lubomir Kundrak 2007-06-28 18:43:43 EDT
Marek: the problem you complained about should be fixed in these new packages:
SPEC: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/SPECS/c2070.spec
SRPM: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/SRPMS/c2070-0.99-2.src.rpm
Comment 4 Marek Mahut 2007-06-29 16:14:41 EDT
+ source files match upstream:
	f503ac3b8f38c39538721843924e2951  /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/c2070-0.99.tar.gz
+ package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
      %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
+ license field matches the actual license.
+ license is open source-compatible. 
+ latest version is being packaged.
+ compiler flags are appropriate.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installs properly
+ debuginfo package looks complete.
+ rpmlint is silent.
+ final provides and requires are sane:
  [root@storm c2070]# rpm -qp --provides
  c2070 = 0.99-2.fc8
  [root@storm c2070]# rpm -qp --requires
  rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
  rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
  [root@storm c2070]# 
+ doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.

Comment 5 Lubomir Kundrak 2007-07-04 07:16:10 EDT
Thanks to Marek, Josh and Warren. The package was imported into CVS.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.