Bug 2453110 - Review Request: pebble - A miniature version of Boulder, a small RFC 8555 ACME test
Summary: Review Request: pebble - A miniature version of Boulder, a small RFC 8555 ACM...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Mikel Olasagasti Uranga
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2026-03-30 17:08 UTC by Paul Wouters
Modified: 2026-04-25 01:30 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2026-03-30 20:42:51 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
mikel: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Paul Wouters 2026-03-30 17:08:22 UTC
Spec URL: https://nohats.ca/ftp/pebble/pebble.spec
SRPM URL: https://nohats.ca/ftp/pebble/pebble-2.10.0-1.fc45.src.rpm
Description: A miniature version of Boulder, Pebble is a small RFC 8555 ACME test server not suited for a production certificate authority
Fedora Account System Username: pwouters

note this is the vendored version of golang-github-letsencrypt-pebble

Comment 1 Mikel Olasagasti Uranga 2026-03-30 17:29:48 UTC
> Summary:        A miniature version of Boulder, Pebble is a small RFC 8555 ACME test server not suited for a production certificate authority

pebble.src: E: summary-too-long A miniature version of Boulder, Pebble is a small RFC 8555 ACME test server not suited for a production certificate authority
pebble.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary Pebble

Comment 2 Paul Wouters 2026-03-30 17:47:51 UTC
fixed up to be:

Summary:        A miniature version of Boulder, a small RFC 8555 ACME test server

Comment 3 Fedora Review Service 2026-03-30 19:07:31 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/10274834
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2453110-pebble/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10274834-pebble/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 4 Mikel Olasagasti Uranga 2026-03-30 19:40:26 UTC
Add the following after "%global gomodulesmode GO111MODULE=on":

export GO_LDFLAGS="-X main.version=%{version}"

This way pebble reports the correct vresion number

# pebble -version
Pebble version: 2.10.0

Instead of:

# pebble -version
Pebble version: dev

Comment 5 Paul Wouters 2026-03-30 19:51:46 UTC
confirmed and fixed:

paul@thinkpad:~$ sudo rpm -Uhv /home/paul/RPMS/x86_64/pebble-2.10.0-1.fc45.x86_64.rpm --noverify --force
Preparing...                          ################################# [100%]
Updating / installing...
   1:pebble-2.10.0-1.fc45             ################################# [100%]
paul@thinkpad:~$ pebble --version
Pebble version: 2.10.0

Comment 6 Mikel Olasagasti Uranga 2026-03-30 19:55:59 UTC
There is another binary named pebble, provided by `golang-github-cockroachdb-pebble`, but both have co-existed until now. Also, `golang-github-cockroachdb-pebble` has been largely unmaintained, not blocking this pebble taking the name.

Golang Package Review
==============

This package was generated using go2rpm and Go Vendor Tools, which simplifies
the review.

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated


- [x] The latest version is packaged or packaging an earlier version is justified.
- [x] The License tag reflects the package contents and uses the correct identifiers.
- [x] The package builds successfully in mock.
- [x] Package is installable (checked by fedora-review).
- [x] There are no relevant rpmlint errors.
- [x] The package runs tests in %check.
- [x] `%goipath` is set correctly.
- [!] The package's binaries don't conflict with binaries already in the distribution. (Some Go projects include utility binaries with very generic names)
- [x] There are no `%{_bindir}/*` wildcards in %files. (go2rpm includes these by default)
- [x] The package does not use `%gometa -f` if it has dependents that still build for %ix86.
- [x] The package complies with the Golang and general Packaging Guidelines.
- [x] GO_LDFLAGS are set correctly.

Package approved! On import, don't forget to do the following:

- [ ] Add the package to release-monitoring.org
- [ ] Give go-sig privileges (at least commit) on the package
- [ ] Close the review bug by referencing its ID in the rpm changelog and the Bodhi ticket.
- [ ] Consider configuring Packit service to help with maintenance

Comment 7 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2026-03-30 20:20:00 UTC
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pebble

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2026-03-30 20:39:14 UTC
FEDORA-2026-b08cfa6f71 (pebble-2.10.0-1.fc45) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 45.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-b08cfa6f71

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2026-03-30 20:42:51 UTC
FEDORA-2026-b08cfa6f71 (pebble-2.10.0-1.fc45) has been pushed to the Fedora 45 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2026-03-31 02:26:39 UTC
FEDORA-2026-55d7a88d10 (pebble-2.10.0-1.fc43) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 43.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-55d7a88d10

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2026-03-31 02:26:59 UTC
FEDORA-2026-aac2ad7faa (pebble-2.10.0-1.fc44) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 44.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-aac2ad7faa

Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2026-04-01 01:28:19 UTC
FEDORA-2026-55d7a88d10 has been pushed to the Fedora 43 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2026-55d7a88d10`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-55d7a88d10

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 13 Fedora Update System 2026-04-01 01:45:14 UTC
FEDORA-2026-aac2ad7faa has been pushed to the Fedora 44 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2026-aac2ad7faa`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-aac2ad7faa

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 14 Fedora Update System 2026-04-01 13:42:41 UTC
FEDORA-2026-62efbeedc4 (pebble-2.10.0-1.fc42) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 42.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-62efbeedc4

Comment 15 Fedora Update System 2026-04-02 02:08:54 UTC
FEDORA-2026-62efbeedc4 has been pushed to the Fedora 42 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2026-62efbeedc4`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-62efbeedc4

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 16 Fedora Update System 2026-04-09 03:21:13 UTC
FEDORA-2026-55d7a88d10 (pebble-2.10.0-1.fc43) has been pushed to the Fedora 43 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 17 Fedora Update System 2026-04-10 01:11:03 UTC
FEDORA-2026-62efbeedc4 (pebble-2.10.0-1.fc42) has been pushed to the Fedora 42 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 18 Fedora Update System 2026-04-25 01:30:03 UTC
FEDORA-2026-aac2ad7faa (pebble-2.10.0-1.fc44) has been pushed to the Fedora 44 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.