Spec URL: http://feannatar.hostuju.cz/fedora/files/development/SPECS/gtk-nodoka-engine.spec SRPM URL: http://feannatar.hostuju.cz/fedora/files/development/SRPMS/gtk-nodoka-engine-0.3.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: This package contains the Nodoka gtk engine as well as Nodoka theme for metacity and gtk. Note: Current upstream is me and Daniel Geiger and we currently release it on the fedora wiki (see the spec file for URL). I however consider submitting a request for inclusion in fedorahosted projects. For more info about the Nodoka theme and engine see fedora-art-list archives.
I've splited the metacity and metatheme into separate package - BZ #248516 and released new version the engine. NEW SPEC: http://feannatar.hostuju.cz/fedora/files/development/SPECS/gtk-nodoka-engine.spec NEW SRPM: http://feannatar.hostuju.cz/fedora/files/development/SRPMS/gtk-nodoka-engine-0.3.2.1-1.fc7.src.rpm
Some trivia: - version of spec file and src.rpm don't match - please use a full src url, if practical - no need to do the obsoletes/provides dance for something that has not ever been in a fedora release. - please don't --enable-animation. I as the gtk2 maintainer am going to veto any theme engine that tries to do that behind the toolkits or apps back. - need to require gtk2 for the engines directory ownership
(In reply to comment #2) > Some trivia: > > - version of spec file and src.rpm don't match > Hm... I see both are 0.3.2.1-1 though Daniel meanwhile updated the src.rpm to 0.5-1. I'll fix the other things in next release and they should match by then. > - please use a full src url, if practical > As we use wiki currently for upstream I think it's impractical ATM > - no need to do the obsoletes/provides dance for something that has not ever > been in a fedora release. > I'll remove them in next release. They were there because older releases were differently handled and I provided the rpms for testing to community and so I added obsoletes/provides for easier upgrade > - please don't --enable-animation. I as the gtk2 maintainer am going to veto > any theme engine that tries to do that behind the toolkits or apps back. > I don't prefer the animation myself so I am OK with that... will remove it in next release. But on the other side... I noticed the Murrine engine has the animation enabled as well and the code behind is exactly the same as in Nodoka engine. > - need to require gtk2 for the engines directory ownership I will add it in next release. I missed it.
New release, fixes the above mentioned issues: NEW SPEC: http://feannatar.hostuju.cz/fedora/files/development/SPECS/gtk-nodoka-engine.spec NEW SRPM: http://feannatar.hostuju.cz/fedora/files/development/SRPMS/gtk-nodoka-engine-0.5-2.fc7.src.rpm
rpmlint is silent on the produced rpm package name: ok spec file name: ok packaging guidelines: ok license: ok license field: ok license file: ok spec language: ok spec legible: yes upstream sources: ok buildable: ok excludearch: n/a build requires: ok locales: n/a shared libs: n/a relocatable: n/a directory ownership: ok file list dupes: ok file permissions: ok %clean section: ok macro use: ok permissible content: ok doc subpackage: n/a %doc content: ok headers: n/a static libs: n/a pc files: n/a shared lib symlinks: n/a devel package: n/a libtool archives: ok gui app: n/a file ownership: ok %install: ok utf8 filenames: ok Approved.
New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gtk-nodoka-engine Short Description: The Nodoka GTK2 theme rendering engine with its default GTK2 theme Owners: martin.sourada Branches: InitialCC:
cvs done.