Bug 253820 - Certwatch doesn't understand option -a because of wrong option parsing
Summary: Certwatch doesn't understand option -a because of wrong option parsing
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4
Classification: Red Hat
Component: crypto-utils
Version: 4.5
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
low
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Joe Orton
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2007-08-22 06:30 UTC by Tuomo Soini
Modified: 2008-01-16 13:56 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version: RHBA-2008-0052
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-01-16 13:56:56 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2008:0052 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE crypto-utils bug fix update 2008-07-23 21:57:14 UTC

Description Tuomo Soini 2007-08-22 06:30:25 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #253819 +++

Description of problem:

certwatch doesn't parse it's arguements correctly

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

crypto-utils-2.3-2

How reproducible:

always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. man certwatch and check for arguments
2. certwatch -a username cert.pem
3. certwatch: invalid option -- a
  
Actual results:
certwatch refuse to accept option -a

Expected results:

certwatch should parse arguments correctly

-- Additional comment from tis on 2007-08-22 02:26 EST --
Created an attachment (id=162030)
Patch to fix certwatch option parsing

Comment 1 Tuomo Soini 2007-08-22 06:31:54 UTC
I cloned this bug to rhel4 product line because same bug affects certwatch in
rhel4 (certwatch.c is same).

Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2008-01-16 13:56:56 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0052.html



Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.