Spec URL: http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/libflashsupport.spec SRPM URL: http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/libflashsupport-000-0.1.svn20070904.src.rpm Description: Optional Library Interfaces for Adobe Flash Player Split from pulseaudio package.
MUST Not sure about these two: • package name: -pulse removed? • library -> ldconfig: confirmation: not needed? I tried calling ldconfig manually and get the following: /sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/libflashsupport.so is not a symbolic link but pulseaudio-lib's libflashsupport does this too. Replacing the libflashsupport.so file with the one from the RPM works, so this is probably OK OK: • rpmlint: src clean, binary missing doc (upstream), contains .so (ok -- does not contain .so.*) • spec file name: matches package name • package guideline-compliant: OK • license complies with guidelines: • license field accurate: OK • spec in US English: OK • spec legible: OK • source matches upstream: OK (SVN) • builds under >= 1 archs, others excluded: OK • build dependencies complete • own all directories: OK • no dupes in %files: OK • permission: OK • %clean RPM_BUILD_ROOT: OK • Package contains code: OK • clean buildroot before install: OK • filenames UTF-8: OK SHOULD • if license text missing, ask upstream to include it • package build in mock on all architectures: OK • package functioned as described: OK • require package not files: OK
Warren, could you make libflashsupport.i386 available on the x86_64 tree as well? Thanks.