Description of problem: With latex2html install on Fedora development, tex output of lyx files result in the following error: .... (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/html/html.sty (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/hyperref/hyperref.sty (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/hyperref/pd1enc.def) (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/hyperref/hyperref.cfg) Implicit mode ON; LaTeX internals redefined ) *hyperref using default driver hdvips* (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/hyperref/hdvips.def (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/hyperref/pdfmark.def))) (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/tools/dcolumn.sty (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/tools/array.sty)) ! LaTeX Error: Missing \begin{document}. See the LaTeX manual or LaTeX Companion for explanation. Type H <return> for immediate help. ... l.49 If latex2html is not there, it complains about not finding html.sty, but otherwise proceeds. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): latex2html-2002.2.1-6
Created attachment 206161 [details] tex output from lyx document
This bug (no html.sty) seems to also be related to problem with bacula not rebuilding because of a missing html.sty when building docs: bug #414381.
Does the new latex2html in rawhide now fix the problem from LyX?
(In reply to comment #3) > Does the new latex2html in rawhide now fix the problem from LyX? Nope.
Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
This message is a reminder that Fedora 9 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 9. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '9'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 9's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 9 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
Fedora 9 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2009-07-10. Fedora 9 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.