Bug 351541 - Driver only works after rmmod/modprobe
Summary: Driver only works after rmmod/modprobe
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: iwl4965-firmware
Version: rawhide
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
high
high
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Dan Williams
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2007-10-24 23:54 UTC by Neal Becker
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:12 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-10-27 14:19:49 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Neal Becker 2007-10-24 23:54:00 UTC
Description of problem:

Don't know if problem is driver or firmware.  I have:
02:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless 4965 AG or AGN 
Network Connection (rev 61)

When first loaded


Oct 24 19:45:24 nbecker1 kernel: iwl4965: Intel(R) Wireless WiFi Link 4965AGN 
driver for Linux, 1.1.17kds
Oct 24 19:45:24 nbecker1 kernel: iwl4965: Copyright(c) 2003-2007 Intel 
Corporation

sudo /sbin/iwlist wlan0 scan
wlan0     Interface doesn't support scanning.

ls /sys/class/net
eth0  lo

But after rmmod/modprobe, it works.  There is also 1 kernel message that 
wasn't there the first time, it's the 3rd one below:
Oct 24 19:45:24 nbecker1 kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:02:00.0[A] -> GSI 16 
(level, low) -> IRQ 16
Oct 24 19:45:24 nbecker1 kernel: iwl4965: Detected Intel Wireless WiFi Link 
4965AGN
Oct 24 19:45:24 nbecker1 kernel: iwl4965: Tunable channels: 11 802.11bg, 13 
802.11a channels

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2007-10-25 00:10:36 UTC
How did you installed iwl4965-firmware ? Was it installed at boot time ?

Anyway that's not a firmware package problem... 
Reassigned to someone who may know better...

(maybe kernel or NetworkManager or else )


Comment 2 Neal Becker 2007-10-25 00:55:55 UTC
I installed the iwl4965-firmware rpm.

As for loading the firmware into the chip, I don't know how that is supposed 
to happen, or how to tell if it did happen.  Any hints?

Comment 3 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2007-10-25 12:43:16 UTC
If you have installed manually the iwl4965-firmware rpm, then that's normal to
reload the module... If you have installed the firmware, then rebooted, then you
need to reload iwl4965 again, that's meant there is a problem... 

Comment 4 Neal Becker 2007-10-25 12:59:20 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> If you have installed manually the iwl4965-firmware rpm, then that's normal 
to
> reload the module... If you have installed the firmware, then rebooted, then 
you
> need to reload iwl4965 again, that's meant there is a problem... 

What does "installed the firmware" mean?  I installed the rpm.

Comment 5 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2007-10-25 13:13:11 UTC
where does this rpm come from ?

Comment 6 Neal Becker 2007-10-25 13:17:41 UTC
(In reply to comment #5)
> where does this rpm come from ?

rpm -q iwl4965-firmware
iwl4965-firmware-4.44.1.18-2.noarch


Comment 7 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2007-10-25 15:09:59 UTC
well ? why did you installed it ?
Wasn't the iwl4965-firmware installed already ?
(Have you run Fedora from a livecd or installed on hard disk ?)

Comment 8 Neal Becker 2007-10-25 17:21:13 UTC
(In reply to comment #7)
> well ? why did you installed it ?
> Wasn't the iwl4965-firmware installed already ?
> (Have you run Fedora from a livecd or installed on hard disk ?)

I installed F8T3 from disk.  Anaconda installed iwl4965-firmware.  I have 
since applied all updates from devel.

Comment 9 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2007-10-25 17:31:50 UTC
Ok, so you have it installed to your drive, but does the problem still appear if
you have rebooted ? (and the same tweaks have to be done each time you reboot ?)

Does it affect the chip detection if you have your "radio kill switch" on/off
before reboot ?

your message on the fedora-devel ml say also:
> Oct 24 09:44:06 nbecker1 NetworkManager: <WARN>
> killswitch_getpower_reply(): Error getting killswitch power:
> hal-ipw-killswitch-linux returned 255.

Why don't you have mentionned this on this bug ???

Which is your laptol model ?

Please be accurate in your answears !



Comment 10 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2007-10-26 16:18:55 UTC
Neal. The problem might be related with "radio kill switch" which vary between
many kind of implementation... AFAIK i don't knwo how to determine which is
your. So a good information to start would be to tell which is you laptop model ?...



Comment 11 Neal Becker 2007-10-26 16:42:36 UTC
(In reply to comment #10)
> Neal. The problem might be related with "radio kill switch" which vary 
between
> many kind of implementation... AFAIK i don't knwo how to determine which is
> your. So a good information to start would be to tell which is you laptop 
model ?...
> 
> 

Sure.  HP dv9000t (brand new)


Comment 12 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2007-10-27 00:42:32 UTC
from your ml list message:
I suppose the bug can be closed.
Can you confirm this ?

Comment 13 Neal Becker 2007-10-27 01:00:38 UTC
(In reply to comment #12)
> from your ml list message:
> I suppose the bug can be closed.
> Can you confirm this ?

Seems OK, thanks for your help.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.