Probably on all platforms. I ran into a bug with the livecd that has since been fixed in kernel. This led me to try a respin which led me to discover that the necessary revisor support to accomplish the respin doesn't exist yet. Being intrepid, I went and grabbed the in-progress versions from the git repo. This in turn led me to discover some bugs in the *production* comps file; there are mandatory packages iprutils and yaboot that are present in the SRPMS tree but are missing in the binary RPM tree on both the publicly served tree and the installation media. I want to suggest two things here: 1. Getting those config files out should be high priority because the livecd is broken; there is a piix SATA problem that also existed in F7 and (judging by google) is being seen all over as people try to install on current core2duo laptops. I see that the needed update is in koji. Not clear if it's done, but if it is it would be good to fast-track it. 2. In future, Fedora should not go to release until it has been confirmed that the initial release can be successfully respun. This would have caught the missing packages, and therefore serves as a useful QA validation. It also ensures that people can rev their way out of any errors that may ship with the initial release.
The missing configuration files are released with revisor-2.0.5-7, pending to be pushed to updates/ (https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/FEDORA-2007-2960)
Great. There was something else -- let me know if you want me to file another bug. I had grabbed those files from git and tried them. Ran into two problems: 1. revisor incorrectly complains that packages are missing when they aren't. The packages in question are designated mandatory in the comps file but are not applicable to the i386 target. Possibly revisor isn't doing the target architecture check, or isn't doing it right. 2. building a respin live-dvd with --live-optical, complaining of lack of space on loop-mounted target ISO fs. Since I was kludging about, item [2] may well be my fault, and I will retry when the RPM update gets out. Item [1] seems like a bug. Want a separate report?
In connection with the target architecture issue, see dcantrell's comments in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=378591
Revisor complaints correctly about the packages missing. These packages are in comps.xml as mandatory or default packages but are not available in the repositories. Revisor will need to complain about these packages missing because they have been selected in kickstart, via groups or directly. Revisor 2.1.0 will not warn about packages missing from the @core group though: http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=revisor;a=commitdiff;h=ab17bfb19b80c62474910077dd95cdbe9317ccd8