Bug 39663 - Rebuild of Ash-0.2-26 doesnt work.
Rebuild of Ash-0.2-26 doesnt work.
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: ash (Show other bugs)
7.0
i386 Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Trond Eivind Glomsrxd
David Lawrence
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2001-05-08 11:07 EDT by Need Real Name
Modified: 2007-04-18 12:33 EDT (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2001-12-06 18:06:51 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Need Real Name 2001-05-08 11:07:27 EDT
Description of Problem:
Downloaded the src rpm for ash-0.2-26 to rebuild it against a different
libc and it DID compile and run, but the shell scripts i use dont run under
it. So I rebuild it against my 7.0 (up to date as of 5/7) and I get the
same thing.

How Reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. rpm --recompile ash-0.2-26.src.rpm
2. 
3. 

Actual Results:


Expected Results: 
An ash shell that works just like the one in the binary package w/ the 7.0
release.


Additional Information:
Comment 1 Crutcher Dunnavant 2001-06-25 19:46:18 EDT
I really cant work with this much info.
In what way do they fail? What is it doing, that it was not?
Comment 2 Trond Eivind Glomsrxd 2001-12-06 18:06:46 EST
Closing, it builds on the current release which is what is supports.
Comment 3 Need Real Name 2001-12-07 07:24:47 EST
The Issue is that following the property recoompile steps does NOT produce the 
equivelant binary package that is being distributed. Yes it compiles and builds 
and all that....but if i install it, i get a DIFFERENT ash that does not 
function the same as the version that you (RH) built and distributed, even 
though the package ash-0.2-26.src.rpm should produce the EXACT equivalent of 
ash-0.2-26-i386.rpm.
Comment 4 Trond Eivind Glomsrxd 2001-12-07 09:21:56 EST
It should produce an equivalent binary on an identical system - yours isn't.
Comment 5 Need Real Name 2001-12-07 12:07:35 EST
I built it on a RedHat 7.0 system Fully updated (as of that time). The binary 
produced DID NOT FUNCTION THE SAME. ITs been a long time now so i dont recall 
the exact differences, but basically there werer a binch of my shell scripts 
AND REDHAT scripts that DID NOT RUN UNDER THAT COMPILED VERSION. Ash would 
report back syntax errors. But using the pre-compiled RH version they worked.
That is a bug.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.