Bug 427587 - Software Channel Entitlements should be in a meaningful order
Summary: Software Channel Entitlements should be in a meaningful order
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Satellite 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: WebUI
Version: 510
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
high
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Shannon Hughes
QA Contact: Steve Salevan
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 456998
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2008-01-04 22:00 UTC by Justin Sherrill
Modified: 2010-07-29 16:46 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version: sat530
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-09-10 19:47:26 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Justin Sherrill 2008-01-04 22:00:16 UTC
On this page:

/rhn/admin/multiorg/OrgSoftwareSubscriptions.do

The list of channel families are no meaningful order.  This make them hard to
look through.  IF they were in alphabetical order, it would be much better.

Comment 1 Shannon Hughes 2008-01-07 16:30:37 UTC
reassign to jmatthews

Comment 2 Todd Sanders 2008-01-09 15:29:16 UTC
Punting to 5.2 Triage

Comment 7 Shannon Hughes 2008-12-11 19:47:33 UTC
changed query order to ASC from DESC. moving to modified.

Comment 8 Steve Salevan 2009-01-21 22:58:42 UTC
Query order matches descending ASCII alphabetical listing (where capital letters have heavier weight than lowercase characters in the sort), so I'm moving this over to VERIFIED.

Comment 9 wes hayutin 2009-07-31 12:10:53 UTC
list is in order..
RHEL Cluster-Storage   	 10  	 0  	
Possible Values: 0 to 95.
RHEL Clustering 	10 	0 	
Possible Values: 0 to 95.
RHEL Desktop FasTrack 	10 	0 	
Possible Values: 0 to 95.
RHEL Desktop Multi OS 	10 	0 	
Possible Values: 0 to 95.
RHEL Desktop Supplementary 	10 	0 	
Possible Values: 0 to 95.
RHEL Desktop Workstation 	10 	0 	
Possible Values: 0 to 95.
RHEL Desktop Workstation FasTrack 	10 	0 	
Possible Values: 0 to 95.
RHEL FasTrack

release pending

Comment 10 Brandon Perkins 2009-09-10 19:47:26 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2009-1434.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.