Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.
Bug 428519 - [RFE] AutoErrata scheduled actions by a real username
[RFE] AutoErrata scheduled actions by a real username
Product: Red Hat Network
Classification: Red Hat
Component: RHN/Web Site (Show other bugs)
All Linux
low Severity low
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Grant Gainey
Amy Owens
: 449397 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks: 443075
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2008-01-12 14:36 EST by daryl herzmann
Modified: 2018-10-19 21:17 EDT (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: 5.0.6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2008-06-26 16:20:45 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description daryl herzmann 2008-01-12 14:36:17 EST
Sorry to keep filing nick picking RFEs on RHN :)

Currently, when errata is applied to auto-update machines, the RHN hosted
website shows this for the action summary:

"Errata Update scheduled by (none)"

Of course, something had to have scheduled it, not "(none)"  :)  

My suggestion would be to say something like:

Errata Update *automatically* scheduled by "Task-O-Matic"  or "RHN" or
"something", not "(none)" :)

Comment 1 daryl herzmann 2008-04-18 14:34:00 EDT

Any commentary on this request? 

Yes, no, maybe, this request is a waste of our time! :)

Comment 2 Jeremy West 2008-04-18 16:27:29 EDT

Feature requests are never a waste of time, however could you please work
through your Red Hat technician to make sure we get all the information we need
to process this correctly?

Jeremy West
Comment 3 daryl herzmann 2008-04-18 16:46:46 EDT
Hi Jeremy,

I am not sure what you mean by a 'Red Hat technician', we don't have a TAM.  I
did file a CRM ticket on this request, if that is what you are asking.

Comment 5 Grant Gainey 2008-04-23 19:27:11 EDT
So my current thought is to change "(none)" to "Red Hat" - since what we really
want to distinguish "Someone in my Org did this" from "something in the code did
this".  Subject to change - but that's the direction I'se heading.
Comment 6 Amy Owens 2008-04-25 10:51:28 EDT
all set on dev
Comment 7 Amy Owens 2008-06-02 14:48:57 EDT
*** Bug 449397 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8 Stephen Herr 2008-06-16 11:43:37 EDT
verified in qa

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.