Bug 428519 - [RFE] AutoErrata scheduled actions by a real username
Summary: [RFE] AutoErrata scheduled actions by a real username
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Network
Classification: Red Hat
Component: RHN/Web Site   
(Show other bugs)
Version: rhn500
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Grant Gainey
QA Contact: Amy Owens
Whiteboard: US=17266
: 449397 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks: 443075
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2008-01-12 19:36 UTC by daryl herzmann
Modified: 2018-10-20 01:17 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version: 5.0.6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2008-06-26 20:20:45 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description daryl herzmann 2008-01-12 19:36:17 UTC
Sorry to keep filing nick picking RFEs on RHN :)

Currently, when errata is applied to auto-update machines, the RHN hosted
website shows this for the action summary:

"Errata Update scheduled by (none)"

Of course, something had to have scheduled it, not "(none)"  :)  

My suggestion would be to say something like:

Errata Update *automatically* scheduled by "Task-O-Matic"  or "RHN" or
"something", not "(none)" :)


Comment 1 daryl herzmann 2008-04-18 18:34:00 UTC

Any commentary on this request? 

Yes, no, maybe, this request is a waste of our time! :)


Comment 2 Jeremy West 2008-04-18 20:27:29 UTC

Feature requests are never a waste of time, however could you please work
through your Red Hat technician to make sure we get all the information we need
to process this correctly?

Jeremy West

Comment 3 daryl herzmann 2008-04-18 20:46:46 UTC
Hi Jeremy,

I am not sure what you mean by a 'Red Hat technician', we don't have a TAM.  I
did file a CRM ticket on this request, if that is what you are asking.


Comment 5 Grant Gainey 2008-04-23 23:27:11 UTC
So my current thought is to change "(none)" to "Red Hat" - since what we really
want to distinguish "Someone in my Org did this" from "something in the code did
this".  Subject to change - but that's the direction I'se heading.

Comment 6 Amy Owens 2008-04-25 14:51:28 UTC
all set on dev

Comment 7 Amy Owens 2008-06-02 18:48:57 UTC
*** Bug 449397 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 8 Stephen Herr 2008-06-16 15:43:37 UTC
verified in qa

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.