Sorry to keep filing nick picking RFEs on RHN :)
Currently, when errata is applied to auto-update machines, the RHN hosted
website shows this for the action summary:
"Errata Update scheduled by (none)"
Of course, something had to have scheduled it, not "(none)" :)
My suggestion would be to say something like:
Errata Update *automatically* scheduled by "Task-O-Matic" or "RHN" or
"something", not "(none)" :)
Any commentary on this request?
Yes, no, maybe, this request is a waste of our time! :)
Feature requests are never a waste of time, however could you please work
through your Red Hat technician to make sure we get all the information we need
to process this correctly?
I am not sure what you mean by a 'Red Hat technician', we don't have a TAM. I
did file a CRM ticket on this request, if that is what you are asking.
So my current thought is to change "(none)" to "Red Hat" - since what we really
want to distinguish "Someone in my Org did this" from "something in the code did
this". Subject to change - but that's the direction I'se heading.
all set on dev
*** Bug 449397 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
verified in qa