Bug 428519 - [RFE] AutoErrata scheduled actions by a real username
[RFE] AutoErrata scheduled actions by a real username
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Product: Red Hat Network
Classification: Red Hat
Component: RHN/Web Site (Show other bugs)
rhn500
All Linux
low Severity low
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Grant Gainey
Amy Owens
US=17266
:
: 449397 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks: 443075
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2008-01-12 14:36 EST by daryl herzmann
Modified: 2010-10-22 17:42 EDT (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: 5.0.6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-06-26 16:20:45 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description daryl herzmann 2008-01-12 14:36:17 EST
Sorry to keep filing nick picking RFEs on RHN :)

Currently, when errata is applied to auto-update machines, the RHN hosted
website shows this for the action summary:

"Errata Update scheduled by (none)"

Of course, something had to have scheduled it, not "(none)"  :)  

My suggestion would be to say something like:

Errata Update *automatically* scheduled by "Task-O-Matic"  or "RHN" or
"something", not "(none)" :)

thanks!
Comment 1 daryl herzmann 2008-04-18 14:34:00 EDT
Hi,

Any commentary on this request? 

Yes, no, maybe, this request is a waste of our time! :)

daryl
Comment 2 Jeremy West 2008-04-18 16:27:29 EDT
Daryl,

Feature requests are never a waste of time, however could you please work
through your Red Hat technician to make sure we get all the information we need
to process this correctly?

Thanks
Jeremy West
Comment 3 daryl herzmann 2008-04-18 16:46:46 EDT
Hi Jeremy,

I am not sure what you mean by a 'Red Hat technician', we don't have a TAM.  I
did file a CRM ticket on this request, if that is what you are asking.

daryl
Comment 5 Grant Gainey 2008-04-23 19:27:11 EDT
So my current thought is to change "(none)" to "Red Hat" - since what we really
want to distinguish "Someone in my Org did this" from "something in the code did
this".  Subject to change - but that's the direction I'se heading.
Comment 6 Amy Owens 2008-04-25 10:51:28 EDT
all set on dev
Comment 7 Amy Owens 2008-06-02 14:48:57 EDT
*** Bug 449397 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8 Stephen Herr 2008-06-16 11:43:37 EDT
verified in qa

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.