Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 428897
Package Review: open-isns
Last modified: 2012-06-27 05:22:40 EDT
Mike Christie is the developer ad can provide the packages
Thanks for making this Rob.
Here is the fedora package review BZ to go with this. In that BZ are the rpms
and specs (fedora one will work on RHEL).
Sending Tom's way for re-assignment
I had one question that is specific to RHEL about this package.
For isns we want to be able to also do some slp querys. In Fedora, we already
have the openslp package:
What do I need to do to get the openslp package already in Fedora, into RHEL 5
so isns can use it? Can this just be done when the isns package gets added as
part of this bugzilla, or should I open a new bz for that?
No, that would need to be a new bug, new errata, new PM acks, etc. Sorry.
(In reply to comment #4)
> No, that would need to be a new bug, new errata, new PM acks, etc. Sorry.
Ah ok thanks. I will just build isns without the slp discovery support for now then.
The isns-utils package was approved for Fedora in this bz
I rebuilt the src rpm for RHEL 5 here:
Looking at it...
Seems reasonable from the Fedora review. Minor comments:
Version of 0.0 seems odd - upstream does have a version to go along with the
date (at least, they have 0.90, 0.91 tarballs)
Why is the name of upstream open-isns and the package isns-utils?
(In reply to comment #7)
> Looking at it...
> Seems reasonable from the Fedora review. Minor comments:
> Version of 0.0 seems odd - upstream does have a version to go along with the
> date (at least, they have 0.90, 0.91 tarballs)
My mistake. I fixed that for RHEL and will fix for fedora. For RHEL I wanted the
0.91 code since it does not have SLP. For Fedora I want the snapshot which has
SLP, and I will fix the naming to take into account that it is based on .91.
> Why is the name of upstream open-isns and the package isns-utils?
I was just following the naming of the other scsi and iscsi packages. Instead of
TGT (name of upstream target layer prohect) we named the rpm scsi-target-utils.
For iSCSI tools/daemon the upstream project is open-iscsi/linux-iscsi, and our
package is named iscsi-initiator-utils. So I thought it would be nicer to
maintain similar naming and for the upstream open-isns package I named the rpm
Here is a updated RHEL package with the version change. Let me know if you want
to name it differently too, and I will rebuild.
The name is ok, just was curious. Moving to the approved tracker.