Bug 43146 - weight field on web_user_order not correct
weight field on web_user_order not correct
Product: Red Hat Web Site
Classification: Red Hat
Component: New Store (Show other bugs)
i386 Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Cameron Prince
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2001-06-01 07:50 EDT by Jay Turner
Modified: 2015-01-07 18:46 EST (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2001-06-02 14:18:08 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Jay Turner 2001-06-01 07:50:52 EDT
Description of Problem:
IC is populating the weigth field on web_user_order with some quantity
whose origin I have no clue (possibly product weight as opposed to shipping

How Reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Pull up order W2261074 in sqlplus and take a look at the weight field

Actual Results:
weight is '4' for this order, even though the order is for quantity 3 of
the Professional boxed set (whose shipping weight is listed as 5.1 . . .
so, quantity 3 would be 15.3)

Expected Results:
Should either show the total shipping weight or the total product weight
for the order.

Additional Information:
Comment 1 David Totten 2001-06-01 15:23:38 EDT
weight is generated from the shipping_weight column in rh_product
Comment 2 Jay Turner 2001-06-01 15:45:31 EDT
You see, that is the problem.  Order W2261074 has 3 line items, 5619, 73 and 71.
 73 is shipping, therefore no weight.  71 is tax, therefore no weight.  5619 is
the Professional boxed set.  On rh_product, the shipping_weight is '5.1'.  But
on web_user_order, the weight for the order is listed at '4.4' . . . since I
bought 3 of these on this order, shouldn't this be '15.3'?
Comment 3 David Totten 2001-06-01 16:27:50 EDT
This is now fixed on http://webdevel.redhat.com/cgi-bin/store
Comment 4 Jay Turner 2001-06-02 14:18:04 EDT
Indeed fixed on webdevel.  Will verify this fix in the next RPM rolled to webqa.
Comment 5 Jay Turner 2001-06-04 15:05:44 EDT
Fix verified on webqa.  Closing out the bug.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.