Bug 432769 - Error: Missing Dependency: libcxgb3 = 1.0-6.el5 is needed by package libcxgb3-devel
Summary: Error: Missing Dependency: libcxgb3 = 1.0-6.el5 is needed by package libcxgb3...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: libcxgb3
Version: 5.2
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: beta
: ---
Assignee: Doug Ledford
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2008-02-14 09:47 UTC by Milan Zázrivec
Modified: 2008-05-21 17:25 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: RHBA-2008-0432
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-05-21 17:25:19 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2008:0432 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE openib bug fix and enhancement update 2008-05-20 16:47:22 UTC

Description Milan Zázrivec 2008-02-14 09:47:13 UTC
Description of problem:
When upgrading RHEL5.1-Server to RHEL5.2-Server via yum dir repo, following
dependencey problem pops up:

--> Processing Dependency: libcxgb3 = 1.0-6.el5 for package: libcxgb3-devel
...
Error: Missing Dependency: libcxgb3 = 1.0-6.el5 is needed by package libcxgb3-devel

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
RHEL5.2-Server-20080212.0 / libcxgb3-1.1.2-1.el5

How reproducible:
Always

Additional info:
libcxgb3-devel was renamed to libcxgb3-static in RHEL5.2 (most likely the
cause of the upgrade problem).

Comment 2 Dennis Gregorovic 2008-02-14 16:59:06 UTC
libcxgb3 is now a component in bugzilla.  switching.

Comment 6 Milan Zázrivec 2008-04-14 11:53:41 UTC
Verified in RHEL5.2-Server-20080409.0

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2008-05-21 17:25:19 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0432.html



Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.