Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 435071
3.25: Foreign key support in DB schema.
Last modified: 2013-06-24 00:16:39 EDT
Create this bug to track the progress of submitting FKs code to upstream.
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #406351 +++
Red Hat has added referential integrity checks to the database schema to ensure
against any foreign key violations. Upstream Bugzilla code has implemented some
initial support for foreign keys as well.
MySQL 5+ redhat/bugs-fk.mysql
-- Additional comment from email@example.com on 2007-12-18 01:17 EST --
It is implemented in bugs-fk.mysql file. I used historical method and the LOC
-- Additional comment from firstname.lastname@example.org on 2007-12-18 08:36 EST --
Tony, how do you get 640 lines? I would expect that you only have to add
the FK constraints. That would be around 100LOC, no?
-- Additional comment from email@example.com on 2007-12-18 20:26 EST --
I used cloc to calculate the LOC of our existing db schema file, which includes
FK constraints and all talbes definition as well. For FK constraints only,
100LOC is a reasonable number.
Changing LOC to 100.
-- Additional comment from firstname.lastname@example.org on 2008-01-10 01:17 EST --
Added FKs constraints in Bugzilla/DB/Schema.pm file. Please refer to bug #420611.
-- Additional comment from email@example.com on 2008-01-24 20:16 EST --
Submitted a Bugzilla/DB/Schema.pm patch, which included all foreign key
constraints, to upstream for review.
-- Additional comment from firstname.lastname@example.org on 2008-01-24 22:02 EST --
Tony please attach the upstream bug link to this bug so we can keep track of it.
Either in the External Bugzilla References section or in the URL text field.
-- Additional comment from email@example.com on 2008-02-11 02:21 EST --
Get review feedback from upstream.
Update the schema according to the feedback and submitted new patch for upstream
-- Additional comment from firstname.lastname@example.org on 2008-02-14 00:32 EST --
Do we already have this in our 3.2 tree? If not we will need a patch for this
bug so hit our first milestone.
-- Additional comment from email@example.com on 2008-02-14 01:57 EST --
(In reply to comment #8)
> Do we already have this in our 3.2 tree? If not we will need a patch for this
> bug so hit our first milestone.
It should have been included in Bugzilla/DB/Schema.pm I attached in #420611.
-- Additional comment from firstname.lastname@example.org on 2008-02-15 02:24 EST --
Will create a new bug to track the progress of mergering FKs constraints into
Close this bug.
Tony, how are we doing with this bug? Do we have all of the needed FK changes
now submitted upstream? If yes, we can probably close this bug as NEXTRELEASE
since we have the FK support in our code as well.
Also please close all of the dependencies on this bug if they are also in the
current beta code base.