Trying to install an untrusted package from a repo with gpgcheck=1 yields a good error message explaining the situation. Trying to update an untrusted package gives an unspecific internal error.
Oooh, can you attach the backtrace pls. Thanks.
Not sure I know what you are asking for here. backtrace from the backend ?
Yes, with the internal error we should also get the backtrace. The backend should never backtrace on us, and so if it does it's a bug. Thanks.
no backtrace, here is the exact message I see: Unknown error Error in Package Signatures Public key for djbfft-0.76-6.lvn6.i386.rpm is not installed So I guess it would be enough te get rid of the "Unknown error" and make "Error in Package Signatures" the primary text.
Ahh, gotcha. I've fixed this in master. I'll port back to stable today.
Fixed (enough?) for F9?
Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
Since there are insufficient details provided in this report for us to investigate the issue further, and we have not received feedback to the information we have requested above, we will assume the problem was not reproducible, or has been fixed in one of the updates we have released for the reporter's distribution. Users who have experienced this problem are encouraged to upgrade to the latest update of their distribution, and if this issue turns out to still be reproducible in the latest update, please reopen this bug with additional information. Closing as INSUFFICIENT_DATA.