Bug 442997 - Luci inserts "hostname" instead of "ipaddr" for rsa II fencing device
Summary: Luci inserts "hostname" instead of "ipaddr" for rsa II fencing device
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: conga
Version: 5.3
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
urgent
urgent
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Ryan McCabe
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2008-04-18 03:26 UTC by Ryan McCabe
Modified: 2009-04-16 22:18 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-01-20 21:55:43 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2009:0196 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE conga bug-fix and enhancement update 2009-01-20 16:06:02 UTC

Description Ryan McCabe 2008-04-18 03:26:02 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #442933 +++

Description of problem: When adding a rsa II fencing device via luci for a
cluster it has a field for entering the hostname vice the IP address.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
luci-0.10.0-6.el5.x86_64 ?


How reproducible: Every time it is used.


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Add a fence device
2. Choose the IBM RSA II
3. Field name is hostname and that is what is added to cluster.conf
  
Actual results: hostname is listed instead of ipaddr and when trying to fence a
node, the results are "failed" due to not being able to reference the ipaddr.


Expected results: The fence device uses ipaddr and not hostname.


Additional info: jparsons has produced a fix which hasn't been implemented at
the client site yet.

Comment 4 Brian Brock 2008-12-16 23:24:58 UTC
verified

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2009-01-20 21:55:43 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-0196.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.