Bug 443002 - luci shows wrong state for 'Monitor link' checkbox in IP resource
Summary: luci shows wrong state for 'Monitor link' checkbox in IP resource
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Cluster Suite
Classification: Retired
Component: conga
Version: 4
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Ryan McCabe
QA Contact: Brian Brock
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2008-04-18 04:18 UTC by Ryan McCabe
Modified: 2009-04-16 20:27 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version: RHBA-2008-0798
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-07-25 19:14:33 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2008:0798 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE conga bug fix and enhancement update 2008-07-25 19:14:11 UTC

Comment 2 RHEL Program Management 2008-04-18 04:19:29 UTC 
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release.  Product Management has requested
further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential
inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed
products.  This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update
release.
Comment 5 Brian Brock 2008-05-23 19:15:19 UTC 
fix verified in 0.11.1-4.el4

the monitor_link field in cluster.conf correctly reflects the state of the
checkbox in the GUI.  The checkbox in the GUI also changes state as expected.

Changing state to verified
Comment 6 Brian Brock 2008-05-23 19:49:59 UTC 
oops, really changing bug state to verified this time.
Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2008-07-25 19:14:33 UTC 
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0798.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.