Bug 445146 - Review Request: roadstencil-fonts - Roadstencil fonts
Summary: Review Request: roadstencil-fonts - Roadstencil fonts
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Kevin Fenzi
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Depends On:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2008-05-04 18:51 UTC by Jon Stanley
Modified: 2008-07-30 20:11 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2008-05-05 17:25:02 UTC
kevin: fedora-review+
kevin: fedora-cvs+

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Jon Stanley 2008-05-04 18:51:11 UTC
Spec URL: http://jstanley.fedorapeople.org/roadstencil-fonts.spec
SRPM URL: http://jstanley.fedorapeople.org/roadstencil-fonts-1.0-1.fc8.src.rpm
Description: A rough font influenced by roadwork stencils

Comment 1 Jon Stanley 2008-05-04 18:52:32 UTC

roadstencil-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation
- No docs for fonts.

Comment 2 Kevin Fenzi 2008-05-04 18:54:01 UTC
I'd be happy to review this... look for a full review in a bit. 

Comment 3 Kevin Fenzi 2008-05-04 19:16:20 UTC
OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
OK - Spec file matches base package name.
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage.
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines.
OK - License (OFL)
OK - License field in spec matches
See below - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources match upstream md5sum:
b8d647fb353946263f9de439b8e55bb3  andyfitz_-_roadstencil.otf
b8d647fb353946263f9de439b8e55bb3  roadstencil-fonts-1.0/roadstencil.otf
OK - BuildRequires correct
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
OK - Package has a correct %clean section.
OK - Package has correct buildroot
OK - Package is code or permissible content.
OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install

OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files.
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates.
OK - No rpmlint output.
OK - final provides and requires are sane.


OK - Should build in mock.
OK - Should build on all supported archs
OK - Should have sane scriptlets.
OK - Should have dist tag
OK - Should package latest version


1. The upstream website tags this as OFL, so I assume thats the license.
It would be nice if there was a included license or readme saying that with the
font. I'm not sure thats going to be possible with openfontlibrary.org.
Not a blocker.

2. Where did you get the tar.gz?
The Source0 URL seems like it should be:

3. rpmlint says:
roadstencil-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation
Can be ignored.

Can you rework things with the Source0 url from item 2?

Comment 4 Jon Stanley 2008-05-04 19:46:18 UTC
Fixed, same spec.  New SRPM:


Comment 5 Kevin Fenzi 2008-05-04 20:25:12 UTC
Looks good, a pretty simple package. ;) 
This package is APPROVED. 

Comment 6 Jon Stanley 2008-05-04 21:08:00 UTC
New Package CVS Request
Package Name:  roadstencil-fonts
Short Description: Roadstencil fonts
Owners: jstanley
Branches:  F-8 F-9 
Cvsextras Commits: yes

Comment 7 Kevin Fenzi 2008-05-05 02:23:33 UTC
cvs done.

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2008-05-05 07:10:22 UTC
roadstencil-fonts-1.0-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2008-05-05 07:17:26 UTC
roadstencil-fonts-1.0-2.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8

Comment 10 Jon Stanley 2008-05-06 20:05:44 UTC
Package Change Request
Package Name: roadstencil-fonts
New Branches: EL-4 EL-5

Comment 11 Kevin Fenzi 2008-05-06 20:57:58 UTC
cvs done.

Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2008-07-30 20:06:02 UTC
roadstencil-fonts-1.0-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 13 Fedora Update System 2008-07-30 20:11:01 UTC
roadstencil-fonts-1.0-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.