Bug 445399 - require 'rdoc/usage'' raises an Exception because of a missing require in /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rdoc/ri/ri_options.rb
Summary: require 'rdoc/usage'' raises an Exception because of a missing require in /us...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: ruby
Version: 5.1
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
low
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Vít Ondruch
QA Contact: QE Internationalization Bugs
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2008-05-06 18:12 UTC by Stephen John Smoogen
Modified: 2018-11-27 20:49 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-02-21 06:00:37 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2012:0218 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE ruby bug fix update 2012-02-20 15:08:02 UTC

Description Stephen John Smoogen 2008-05-06 18:12:36 UTC
Description of problem:

ruby raises an exception because of missing requires

require 'rdoc/ri/ri_paths'

upstream bug number: 
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1698&aid=5563&group_id=426

reported downstream number:
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2824

ruby-1.8.5-5.el5_1.1

confirmed on CentOS-5.1
tested and confirmed with RHEL-5.2 beta 


0002824: `require 'rdoc/usage'' raises an Exception because of a missing require
in /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rdoc/ri/ri_options.rb 


How reproducible:
100%

Comment 1 Michael Stahnke 2009-08-25 00:12:04 UTC
Please fix this.  It is affecting production systems.

Comment 2 Michael Stahnke 2009-08-25 00:12:35 UTC
Also, it's still there in 5.3. Patch has been rolled into upstream.

Comment 3 RHEL Program Management 2009-11-06 19:11:57 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for
inclusion, but this component is not scheduled to be updated in
the current Red Hat Enterprise Linux release. If you would like
this request to be reviewed for the next minor release, ask your
support representative to set the next rhel-x.y flag to "?".

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2012-02-21 06:00:37 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0218.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.