Spec URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/R-RSQLite.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/R-RSQLite-0.6-1.fc9.src.rpm Read/Write SQLite interface for R, allowing manipulation of database objects for statistically purposes.
Shouldn't this have a build dependency on R-DBI?
(In reply to comment #1) > Shouldn't this have a build dependency on R-DBI? And you'd be right, DOH! Spec URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/R-RSQLite.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/R-RSQLite-0.6-3.fc9.src.rpm
I'd suggest using http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/RSQLite/index.html for the URL, as it actually has some information about the package. * source files match upstream: 8eb6faf25b494db17c74e0a83099839796539ae059cc8fd58fbac13aac2c63d8 RSQLite_0.6-9.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: RSQLite.so()(64bit) R-RSQLite = 0.6-3.fc10 = /bin/bash /bin/sh R R-DBI libR.so()(64bit) * %check is present and all tests pass. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets OK (R package registration) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. APPROVED
(In reply to comment #3) > I'd suggest using http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/RSQLite/index.html for > the URL, as it actually has some information about the package. > Your right, I thought I changed that one... > APPROVED Thanks, New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: R-RSQLite Short Description: SQLite database interface for R Owners: nigelj Branches: F-8 F-9 Cvsextras Commits: yes Note there will most likely be a EL-4/5 request in the future but I haven't had a chance to even check if the version of SQLite is new enough for this package yet. (I know it prevents a few of my other packages entering EL-* though)
cvs done.
R-RSQLite-0.6-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9
R-RSQLite-0.6-3.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8
R-RSQLite-0.6-3.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
R-RSQLite-0.6-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.