Bug 451076 - Horde: explicit requirement for Mail_mimeDecode is not needed
Horde: explicit requirement for Mail_mimeDecode is not needed
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: horde (Show other bugs)
rawhide
All Linux
low Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Nigel Jones
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2008-06-12 13:21 EDT by Greg Swallow
Modified: 2008-06-29 04:51 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: horde-3.2.1-1.fc9
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-06-29 04:51:59 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Greg Swallow 2008-06-12 13:21:28 EDT
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #435643 +++

Description of problem:

Pear package Mail_mimeDecode is required for Horde. See F8 bug #415221.

<snip>
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 415221 ***


I believe the fix for horde requiring php-pear-Mail-mimeDecode in FC8 & FC9 has 
been accomplished by php-pear-Mail-Mime requiring "php-pear(Mail_mimeDecode)"
, so there is no need for horde to require the same thing, as it already 
requires php-pear(Mail_Mime), which will pull in both rpms in FC8/9/rawhide.  
If you remove the extra mimeDecode requirement in horde then it can be built 
for EL5 without modification, as there is not a separate Mail-mimeDecode rpm 
there, mimeDecode is part of the Mail-Mime rpm.

fix:

-Requires:	php-pear(Mail_mimeDecode)

Cheers, 

Greg

PS - need any help with making/testing horde 3.2 rpms? ...especially for 
EPEL5 :-)
Comment 1 Nigel Jones 2008-06-12 19:47:50 EDT
Thanks for the bug report, I've been working on improving the whole dependency
problem, I've what can base the start of new packages locally, but I won't have
a chance to put them online for another week or so.

I'll keep EL-5 in mind.  Changing this to ASSIGNED :)
Comment 2 Nigel Jones 2008-06-22 00:38:05 EDT
(In reply to comment #1)
> Thanks for the bug report, I've been working on improving the whole dependency
> problem, I've what can base the start of new packages locally, but I won't have
> a chance to put them online for another week or so.
> 
> I'll keep EL-5 in mind.  Changing this to ASSIGNED :)
I'm pushing horde 2.2.1 to rawhide today.

I'm going to prepare some EL-5, F-8, F-9 etc RPMs later tonight for
{epel-,f9-,f8-}testing.
Comment 3 Fedora Update System 2008-06-24 00:26:51 EDT
horde-3.2.1-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8
Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2008-06-24 00:27:03 EDT
horde-3.2.1-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9
Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2008-06-24 22:53:54 EDT
horde-3.2.1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2008-06-24 22:54:26 EDT
horde-3.2.1-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.