Bug 451136 - New package SPEC file for ghc-cabal-rpm
New package SPEC file for ghc-cabal-rpm
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review (Show other bugs)
rawhide
All Linux
low Severity low
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/ha...
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2008-06-12 18:48 EDT by Rajesh Krishnan
Modified: 2010-01-25 19:00 EST (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-06-17 19:27:58 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Spec file to create the ghc-cabal-rpm package useful for creating RPM packages for GHC modules. (3.81 KB, text/plain)
2008-06-12 18:48 EDT, Rajesh Krishnan
no flags Details

  None (edit)
Description Rajesh Krishnan 2008-06-12 18:48:34 EDT
Description of problem:
New package spec.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Fedora 8

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.  Download 
http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/cabal-rpm/0.5.1/cabal-rpm-0.5.1.tar.gz 
to rpmbuild/SOURCES folder.
2.  Copy attached ghc-cabal-rpm.spec to rpmbuild/SPECS folder.
3.  Execute:
rpmbuild --clean  --target=$(uname -i) -ba 
rpmbuild/SPECS/ghc-cabal-rpm-0.5.1-1.spec
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:
1. The same .SPEC should work for Fedora 9 also (I guess).
2. The cabal-rpm binary gets copied 
into /usr/lib64/ghc-6.8.2/ghc-cabal-rpm-0.5.1-pkg/bin on my system (may or may 
not be appropriate).
Comment 1 Rajesh Krishnan 2008-06-12 18:48:34 EDT
Created attachment 309148 [details]
Spec file to create the ghc-cabal-rpm package useful for creating RPM packages for GHC modules.
Comment 2 Jason Tibbitts 2008-06-17 11:40:14 EDT
I'm adding NotReady to the status whiteboard for all of these tickets so that
they don't show up in the review queue.  If you actually plan to pay attention
to any of the commentary that's been offered and will correct the problems such
that these tickets are reviewable, please remove NotReady from the status
whiteboard and they will reappear to reviewers.
Comment 3 Rajesh Krishnan 2008-06-17 17:23:10 EDT
What is the problem with this SPEC?
-Rajesh
Comment 4 Bryan O'Sullivan 2008-06-17 19:27:58 EDT
Your submission doesn't follow the packaging guidelines, and the spec file is
autogenerated garbage.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.