Bug 453597 - new subpackage systemtap-testsuite need to be added to comps
new subpackage systemtap-testsuite need to be added to comps
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4
Classification: Red Hat
Component: comps (Show other bugs)
4.7
All Linux
high Severity high
: rc
: ---
Assigned To: Daniel Mach
Alexander Todorov
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2008-07-01 10:37 EDT by Daniel Mach
Modified: 2008-07-24 15:07 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: RHBA-2008-0655
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-07-24 15:07:24 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Daniel Mach 2008-07-01 10:37:39 EDT
Description of problem:
There is new subpackage of systemtap: systemtap-testsuite
We need to update comps to get it in composes.
Comment 2 Daniel Mach 2008-07-02 09:48:16 EDT
systemtap-testsuite has been added to ppc64-compat-arch-development group


file list from compose 0701.0:
tree-AS-i386/RedHat/RPMS/systemtap-runtime-0.6.2-1.el4.i386.rpm
tree-AS-ia64/RedHat/RPMS/systemtap-runtime-0.6.2-1.el4.ia64.rpm
tree-AS-ppc/RedHat/RPMS/systemtap-runtime-0.6.2-1.el4.ppc64.rpm
tree-AS-x86_64/RedHat/RPMS/systemtap-runtime-0.6.2-1.el4.x86_64.rpm
tree-Desktop-i386/RedHat/RPMS/systemtap-runtime-0.6.2-1.el4.i386.rpm
tree-Desktop-x86_64/RedHat/RPMS/systemtap-runtime-0.6.2-1.el4.x86_64.rpm
tree-ES-i386/RedHat/RPMS/systemtap-runtime-0.6.2-1.el4.i386.rpm
tree-ES-ia64/RedHat/RPMS/systemtap-runtime-0.6.2-1.el4.ia64.rpm
tree-ES-x86_64/RedHat/RPMS/systemtap-runtime-0.6.2-1.el4.x86_64.rpm
tree-WS-i386/RedHat/RPMS/systemtap-runtime-0.6.2-1.el4.i386.rpm
tree-WS-ia64/RedHat/RPMS/systemtap-runtime-0.6.2-1.el4.ia64.rpm
tree-WS-x86_64/RedHat/RPMS/systemtap-runtime-0.6.2-1.el4.x86_64.rpm
Comment 4 Alexander Todorov 2008-07-02 14:00:25 EDT
(In reply to comment #2)
> systemtap-testsuite has been added to ppc64-compat-arch-development group
> 

Daniel,
please clarify. ppc64 or ppc, x86 and ia64 arches? The list below shows other
arches except ppc.

> 
> file list from compose 0701.0:
> tree-AS-i386/RedHat/RPMS/systemtap-runtime-0.6.2-1.el4.i386.rpm
> tree-AS-ia64/RedHat/RPMS/systemtap-runtime-0.6.2-1.el4.ia64.rpm
> tree-AS-ppc/RedHat/RPMS/systemtap-runtime-0.6.2-1.el4.ppc64.rpm
> tree-AS-x86_64/RedHat/RPMS/systemtap-runtime-0.6.2-1.el4.x86_64.rpm
> tree-Desktop-i386/RedHat/RPMS/systemtap-runtime-0.6.2-1.el4.i386.rpm
> tree-Desktop-x86_64/RedHat/RPMS/systemtap-runtime-0.6.2-1.el4.x86_64.rpm
> tree-ES-i386/RedHat/RPMS/systemtap-runtime-0.6.2-1.el4.i386.rpm
> tree-ES-ia64/RedHat/RPMS/systemtap-runtime-0.6.2-1.el4.ia64.rpm
> tree-ES-x86_64/RedHat/RPMS/systemtap-runtime-0.6.2-1.el4.x86_64.rpm
> tree-WS-i386/RedHat/RPMS/systemtap-runtime-0.6.2-1.el4.i386.rpm
> tree-WS-ia64/RedHat/RPMS/systemtap-runtime-0.6.2-1.el4.ia64.rpm
> tree-WS-x86_64/RedHat/RPMS/systemtap-runtime-0.6.2-1.el4.x86_64.rpm
> 

Comment 5 Daniel Mach 2008-07-02 14:58:00 EDT
Alex, we didn't ship ppc systemtap due to kernel restrictions and we don't ship
it in rhel-4.7 as well.

I think this list only shows that everything is all right, because
systemtap-runtime is in all trees.
Comment 6 Alexander Todorov 2008-07-03 01:34:39 EDT
(In reply to comment #5)
> Alex, we didn't ship ppc systemtap due to kernel restrictions and we don't ship
> it in rhel-4.7 as well.
> 
> I think this list only shows that everything is all right, because
> systemtap-runtime is in all trees.

Daniel,
please elaborate more on that. Does that mean that systemtap-* was added to ppc
only or it was added to all arches? What is the expected result, systemtap-*
present in all arches? Which groups in comps?

Thanks.
Comment 7 Daniel Mach 2008-07-03 03:53:49 EDT
(In reply to comment #6)
> Daniel,
> please elaborate more on that. Does that mean that systemtap-* was added to ppc
> only or it was added to all arches? What is the expected result, systemtap-*
> present in all arches? Which groups in comps?
> 
> Thanks.
Alex,
as I wrote earlier, systemtap-testsuite has been added to
ppc64-compat-arch-development group, which means it has been added to ppc only.
I got report from a quality engineer, that there's something wrong with errata
file listings and there's systemtap-testsuite missing.
So I filed this bug and started to investigate what happened.
It seems that only ppc change was needed, because systemtap-testsuite is pulled
to other trees by another compose mechanism - NPLB (No Package Left Behind).

If you still need more info, we should pull developer (Frank Eigler
<fche@redhat.com>) to this discussion.
Comment 8 Alexander Todorov 2008-07-07 04:26:07 EDT
systemtap-testsuite is present in the following group:

<id>ppc64-compat-arch-development</id>
<name>ppc64 Compatibility Arch Development Support</name>
<default>false</default>
<uservisible>false</uservisible>

Since it's not default and not visible it's not possible to select this group
from the UI in anaconda. 

Daniel,
please clarify is this the desired behavior? Should this group be
visible+selectable in the UI. Was the addition to comps only needed to pull
systemtap-testsuite in the compose or it was intended that the end user will be
able to select the package manually for installation.
Comment 9 Daniel Mach 2008-07-07 05:06:14 EDT
I updated the same group, which already contained other systemtap packages to
pull systemtap-testsuite into composes.
There was no explicit request to make these packages visible in anaconda.
Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2008-07-24 15:07:24 EDT
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0655.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.