Bug 453771 - segfault in dm_hash_iter()
Summary: segfault in dm_hash_iter()
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: device-mapper
Version: 5.2
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
high
high
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Milan Broz
QA Contact: Cluster QE
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2008-07-02 13:27 UTC by Milan Broz
Modified: 2013-03-01 04:06 UTC (History)
14 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-01-20 21:57:45 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2009:0200 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE device-mapper bug fix and enhancement update 2009-01-20 16:06:06 UTC

Description Milan Broz 2008-07-02 13:27:40 UTC 
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #450474 +++
RHEL5 clone

device-mapper segfaults with new lvm2 build

New lvm2 build requires device-mapper dm_hash_iter to be safe againts deletion
of list member during iteration.
Comment 2 RHEL Program Management 2008-07-02 13:53:30 UTC 
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release.  Product Management has requested
further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential
inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed
products.  This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update
release.
Comment 3 Milan Broz 2008-07-03 08:21:39 UTC 
Fixed in device-mapper-1.02.27-1.el5.
Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2009-01-20 21:57:45 UTC 
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-0200.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.