Bug 454432 - Review Request: libcmpiutil - Utility library for CIM providers
Review Request: libcmpiutil - Utility library for CIM providers
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Package Review (Show other bugs)
5.3
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: rc
: ---
Assigned To: Daniel Berrange
:
Depends On:
Blocks: 188273 445605
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2008-07-08 09:39 EDT by Daniel Veillard
Modified: 2010-01-12 06:52 EST (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-01-12 06:52:13 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Daniel Veillard 2008-07-08 09:39:51 EDT
Spec URL: http://veillard.com/libvirt/5.3/libcmpiutil.spec
SRPM URL: http://veillard.com/libvirt/5.3/src/libcmpiutil-0.4-1.el5.src.rpm
Description: 
Libcmpiutil is a library of utility functions for CMPI providers.
The goal is to reduce the amount of repetitive work done in
most CMPI providers by encapsulating common procedures with more
"normal" APIs.  This extends from operations like getting typed
instance properties to standardizing method dispatch and argument checking.
Comment 1 Daniel Veillard 2008-07-08 09:42:28 EDT
The only doubt I have is whether this should be
ExclusiveArch: i386 x86_64 ia64
or not. This is used only by libvirt-cim which is available
only on those arches. Since the library might be used by more
software for non-virtualization providers I decided to not
limit the arches.

Daniel
Comment 2 Daniel Veillard 2008-07-08 09:43:26 EDT
See also https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445605

Daniel
Comment 3 Daniel Riek 2008-07-15 14:24:53 EDT
What is this component? It is not planned for 5.3:
http://intranet.corp.redhat.com/ic/intranet/RHEL5u3ApprovedPackages
Comment 4 Daniel Riek 2008-07-15 14:34:40 EDT
Sorry I was confused. It *IS* on that list.
Comment 5 Daniel Berrange 2008-09-15 05:15:12 EDT
Original Fedora review ticket:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=387261
Comment 6 Daniel Berrange 2008-09-15 05:42:42 EDT
Successfully builds into binary RPMs for me. Passes rpmlint with no errors. Complies with Fedora packaging guidelines & licensing requirements.

=> Approved

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.