Bug 457358 - Hyperlink to Bodhi?
Summary: Hyperlink to Bodhi?
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: gnome-packagekit
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Robin Norwood
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2008-07-31 05:47 UTC by Matěj Cepl
Modified: 2018-04-11 07:54 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-08-05 09:38:44 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
git master (73.55 KB, image/png)
2008-07-31 09:56 UTC, Richard Hughes
no flags Details
does what it says on the tin (1.24 KB, patch)
2008-07-31 10:06 UTC, Richard Hughes
no flags Details | Diff

Description Matěj Cepl 2008-07-31 05:47:19 UTC
Description of problem:
I love the fact that we have hyperlinks to the particular bugs in the Review
Updates List window (well, in the details for the particular package update),
but it would be even better to have also a hyperlink to the Bodhi for the
particular update. So, that in the (unlikely, of course) event something goes
wrong, there would be easy way how to comment in Bodhi.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
gnome-packagekit-0.2.3-4.fc9.i386

Comment 1 Richard Hughes 2008-07-31 09:56:30 UTC
Created attachment 313084 [details]
git master

What about something like this -- how is the wording?

Comment 2 Richard Hughes 2008-07-31 10:06:57 UTC
Created attachment 313085 [details]
does what it says on the tin

I've applied this to git master -- want me to build an F9 package with this?

Comment 3 Matěj Cepl 2008-07-31 13:27:45 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> What about something like this -- how is the wording?

"Vendor" sounds absolutely terrible to me -- don't know what should be better
but something between "Errata" and "Comments"?

Comment 4 Richard Hughes 2008-07-31 16:57:28 UTC
What about Distribution?


Comment 5 Matěj Cepl 2008-08-01 11:59:18 UTC
What does "Distribution" mean for the user? Shouldn't she expect something like
"Fedora", "Debian", there? I guess some action would be better.

Comment 6 Richard Hughes 2008-08-18 08:39:41 UTC
Well I think the user knows what distribution they are using. This feature works great in 0.3.0, so I'll close this and I'll update rawhide today.

Comment 7 Joshua Roys 2009-08-04 20:13:47 UTC
This links to the incorrect update.  For instance, I am presently updating neon to neon-0.28.5-1.fc11 (x86_64).  At the bottom, it says:

For more information about this update please visit this website:
• https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2009-7680.
For more information about bugs fixed by this update please visit this website:
• https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491839.

The link to bodhi, however, links to:
pidgin-2.5.8-2.fc11 bugfix update

The correct link has a F11 in it:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7680

Still present in current git:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/packagekit/tree/backends/yum/yumBackend.py#n2323

Comment 8 Joshua Roys 2009-08-04 20:18:10 UTC
It looks like the following works, and might be easier:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/neon-0.28.5-1.fc11

Comment 9 Richard Hughes 2009-08-05 09:29:43 UTC
(In reply to comment #7)
> The link to bodhi, however, links to:
> pidgin-2.5.8-2.fc11 bugfix update

Urgh. You mean the FEDORA-xxxx-xxxx numbers are the same for packages across releases. Yuk.

> The correct link has a F11 in it:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7680

Okay, cool, we can add that.

(In reply to comment #8)
> It looks like the following works, and might be easier:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/neon-0.28.5-1.fc11  

I think that will only work for the basepackage, rather than subpackages, so https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/neon-data-0.28.5-1.fc11 (a fictional subpackage of neon) shouldn't exists. I think we just need to extract the "F11" from yum and use that.

Richard.

Comment 10 Richard Hughes 2009-08-05 09:38:44 UTC
commit 250545a41eca1e17e8d5c66fbb86d343151754c6
Author: Richard Hughes <richard>
Date:   Wed Aug 5 10:34:56 2009 +0100

    yum: Include the releasever in the updates link. Fixes rh#457358


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.