Bug 461301 - cman package should depend on pexpect
Summary: cman package should depend on pexpect
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: cman
Version: 5.3
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Chris Feist
QA Contact: Cluster QE
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2008-09-05 17:45 UTC by Nate Straz
Modified: 2009-04-16 22:31 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-01-20 21:51:08 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2009:0189 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE cman bug-fix and enhancement update 2009-01-20 16:05:55 UTC

Description Nate Straz 2008-09-05 17:45:07 UTC
Description of problem:

pexpect is a python module which 6 fence agents now use.  This is a change from the RHEL5.2 version of cman.  Without the dependency upgrades will not pull in the new requirement for fence agents for apc, bladecenter, drac5, ilo, lpar, and wti.  Since this is a library with no other dependencies it should be required by cman.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
cman-2.0.87-5.el5

Comment 1 Chris Feist 2008-09-05 18:55:48 UTC
Since virtually all the new fence agents require pexpect I think the right choice is to require it with cman.

I've added this to the .spec file and it should be in cman after 2.0.87-5.el5.

Comment 3 Chris Feist 2008-09-08 16:02:38 UTC
Built in latest cman.

cman-2.0.88-2.el5

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2009-01-20 21:51:08 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-0189.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.