When I rebuilt glibc 2.2.3-12, I got locales/zh_HK:85: LC_TIME: unknown character in field `abday' locales/zh_HK:86: LC_TIME: unknown character in field `abday' locales/zh_HK:86: LC_TIME: unknown character in field `abday' locales/zh_HK:87: LC_TIME: unknown character in field `abday' locales/zh_HK:87: LC_TIME: unknown character in field `abday' locales/zh_HK:88: LC_TIME: unknown character in field `abday' locales/zh_HK:91: LC_TIME: unknown character in field `day' locales/zh_HK:91: LC_TIME: unknown character in field `day' locales/zh_HK:92: LC_TIME: unknown character in field `day' locales/zh_HK:92: LC_TIME: unknown character in field `day' locales/zh_HK:93: LC_TIME: unknown character in field `day' locales/zh_HK:93: LC_TIME: unknown character in field `day' locales/zh_HK:94: LC_TIME: unknown character in field `day' locales/zh_HK:97: LC_TIME: unknown character in field `abmon' locales/zh_HK:97: LC_TIME: unknown character in field `abmon' locales/zh_HK:98: LC_TIME: unknown character in field `abmon' locales/zh_HK:98: LC_TIME: unknown character in field `abmon' locales/zh_HK:99: LC_TIME: unknown character in field `abmon' locales/zh_HK:99: LC_TIME: unknown character in field `abmon' locales/zh_HK:100: LC_TIME: unknown character in field `abmon' locales/zh_HK:100: LC_TIME: unknown character in field `abmon' locales/zh_HK:101: LC_TIME: unknown character in field `abmon' locales/zh_HK:101: LC_TIME: unknown character in field `abmon' locales/zh_HK:102: LC_TIME: unknown character in field `abmon' locales/zh_HK:102: LC_TIME: unknown character in field `abmon' locales/zh_HK:105: LC_TIME: unknown character in field `mon' locales/zh_HK:105: LC_TIME: unknown character in field `mon' locales/zh_HK:106: LC_TIME: unknown character in field `mon' locales/zh_HK:106: LC_TIME: unknown character in field `mon' locales/zh_HK:107: LC_TIME: unknown character in field `mon' locales/zh_HK:107: LC_TIME: unknown character in field `mon' locales/zh_HK:108: LC_TIME: unknown character in field `mon' locales/zh_HK:108: LC_TIME: unknown character in field `mon' locales/zh_HK:109: LC_TIME: unknown character in field `mon' locales/zh_HK:109: LC_TIME: unknown character in field `mon' locales/zh_HK:110: LC_TIME: unknown character in field `mon' locales/zh_HK:110: LC_TIME: unknown character in field `mon' locales/zh_HK:113: LC_TIME: unknown character in field `am_pm' locales/zh_HK:113: LC_TIME: unknown character in field `am_pm' locales/zh_HK:119: LC_TIME: unknown character in field `d_t_fmt' locales/zh_HK:124: LC_TIME: unknown character in field `d_fmt' locales/zh_HK:129: LC_TIME: unknown character in field `t_fmt' locales/zh_HK:146: LC_MESSAGES: unknown character in field `yesexpr' locales/zh_HK:147: LC_MESSAGES: unknown character in field `noexpr' locales/zh_HK:165: LC_NAME: unknown character in field `name_gen' locales/zh_HK:166: LC_NAME: unknown character in field `name_mr' locales/zh_HK:167: LC_NAME: unknown character in field `name_mrs' locales/zh_HK:168: LC_NAME: unknown character in field `name_miss' locales/zh_HK:169: LC_NAME: unknown character in field `name_ms'
I know, that's why I fixed it and Ulrich commited the patch. It is just that I did not want to rebuild glibc before beta1 once more because of this.
Which change in glibc fixes it?
2001-06-25 Jakub Jelinek <jakub> * SUPPORTED (zh_HK): Update character map name to BIG5-HKSCS.
This defect considered MUST-FIX for Fairfax gold-release.
Fixed since glibc-2.2.3-13.