Description of problem: On the first try to install the hpc kit, the system failed. On the second try it succeeded. I submitted this bug to notify it's occurrence. I am not sure it can be reproduced again. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): hpc-0.1 How reproducible: Not sure Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Loading "rhnplugin" plugin rhel-x86_64-server-5 100% |=========================| 1.4 kB 00:00 rhel-x86_64-server-hpc-5- 100% |=========================| 1.2 kB 00:00 rhel-x86_64-server-supple 100% |=========================| 1.4 kB 00:00 atlas-3.6.0-12.el5.x86_64 100% |=========================| 4.0 MB 00:20 atlas-devel-3.6.0-12.el5. 100% |=========================| 5.5 MB 00:33 blacs-mpich1-gnu-20000224 100% |=========================| 610 kB 00:05 blacs-mvapich1-gnu-200002 100% |=========================| 360 kB 00:03 blacs-openmpi-gnu-2000022 100% |=========================| 356 kB 00:03 bonnie++-1.03a-6.el5.x86_ 100% |=========================| 44 kB 00:01 component-benchmarking-to 100% |=========================| 2.4 kB 00:00 component-hpc-libraries-0 100% |=========================| 2.3 kB 00:00 component-mpich1-librarie 100% |=========================| 2.4 kB 00:00 component-mpich2-librarie 100% |=========================| 2.2 kB 00:00 component-mvapich1-librar 100% |=========================| 2.4 kB 00:00 component-mvapich2-librar 100% |=========================| 2.3 kB 00:00 component-openmpi-librari 100% |=========================| 2.7 kB 00:00 fftw3-3.1.2-5.el5.x86_64. 100% |=========================| 1.0 MB 00:07 fftw3-devel-3.1.2-5.el5.x 100% |=========================| 1.7 MB 00:11 hdf5-1.6.6-2.x86_64.rpm 100% |=========================| 1.5 MB 00:09 hdf5-mpich1-gnu-1.6.6-4.x 100% |=========================| 6.1 MB 00:30 hdf5-openmpi-gnu-1.6.6-3. 100% |=========================| 4.9 MB 00:28 iozone-3-3.el5.x86_64.rpm 100% |=========================| 259 kB 00:02 iperf-2.0.2-4.1.el5.x86_6 100% |=========================| 50 kB 00:01 kit-hpc-0.1-2.x86_64.rpm 100% |=========================| 3.3 kB 00:00 linpack-mpich1-gnu-1.0a-3 100% |=========================| 236 kB 00:03 linpack-mvapich1-gnu-1.0a 100% |=========================| 87 kB 00:02 linpack-openmpi-gnu-1.0a- 100% |=========================| 89 kB 00:01 mpich1-ethernet-gnu-1.2.7 100% |=========================| 4.9 MB 00:27 mpich2-ethernet-gnu-1.0.6 100% |=========================| 2.7 MB 00:19 mvapich1-infiniband-gnu-1 100% |=========================| 5.4 MB 00:37 mvapich2-infiniband-gnu-1 100% |=========================| 2.6 MB 00:21 netcdf-3.6.1-4.el5.x86_64 100% |=========================| 160 kB 00:02 netcdf-devel-3.6.1-4.el5. 100% |=========================| 364 kB 00:05 scalapack-mpich1-gnu-1.8. 100% |=========================| 37 MB 04:10 scalapack-mvapich1-gnu-1. 100% |=========================| 22 MB 02:37 scalapack-openmpi-gnu-1.8 100% |=========================| 21 MB 02:04 Adding kit using kitops... No kits found. Nothing to do. Adding kit using repoman... The kit 'hpc' could not be found Expected results: Additional info:
I am seeing the same behaviour. Not a blocker, but should be fixed soon. Also this needs to be noted in the install docs.
Release note added. If any revisions are required, please set the "requires_release_notes" flag to "?" and edit the "Release Notes" field accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team. New Contents: Summary: Kit installation unsuccessful on first attempt: No kits found. Nothing to do. Details: When running a kit-installer (e.g. /opt/kusu/sbin/install-kit-hpc), the first attempt sometimes fail with the message “No kits found. Nothing to do”. Bugzilla entry: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463491 Work-around: re-run kit installer (e.g. /opt/kusu/sbin/install-kit-hpc).
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-0278.html