Bug 466718 - typo in rhn_register TUI ("receives" -> "receive")
typo in rhn_register TUI ("receives" -> "receive")
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: rhn-client-tools (Show other bugs)
All Linux
low Severity low
: rc
: ---
Assigned To: Shannon Hughes
Red Hat Satellite QA List
: EasyFix
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2008-10-13 03:49 EDT by Jan Hutař
Modified: 2009-09-02 07:22 EDT (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2009-09-02 07:22:00 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Jan Hutař 2008-10-13 03:49:16 EDT
Description of problem:
There is a typo in rhn_register TUI

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1. register the system with rhn_register TUI

Actual results:
┌┤ Confirm operating system release selection ├┐
│   Your system will be subscribed to the      │
│   base software channel to receives all      │
│   available updates.

Maybe also this sounds incorrectly:

┌──────────────┤ Send Profile Information to Red Hat Network ├──
│ We are finished collecting information for the System Profile.

Expected results:
"receives" -> "recive"
Comment 1 Clifford Perry 2009-02-22 22:05:14 EST
Well "receives" should be "receive", to read: 

Your system will be subscribed to the base software channel to receive all available updates.

Agree with 2nd point, change "are" to "have", to read:

We have finished collecting information for the System Profile.

Comment 2 Shannon Hughes 2009-04-15 14:55:43 EDT
typo fixed in trunk.
Comment 3 Shannon Hughes 2009-04-15 14:56:06 EDT
Committed revision 183381.
Comment 5 Jay Turner 2009-06-25 14:10:02 EDT
Typo fix ("receives" -> "receive") is confirmed in 0.4.20-7.el5 which is included in the latest RHEL5.4 trees (200906230.4.20-7.el5.0)

The "are" -> "have" change isn't there, but honestly isn't really necessary, just depends on the tense we wish to put forth.  Moving this to verified.
Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2009-09-02 07:22:00 EDT
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.