Bug 468635 - Missing dependency for jvisualvm
Summary: Missing dependency for jvisualvm
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: java-1.6.0-openjdk
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Lillian Angel
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2008-10-27 00:31 UTC by Mark Wielaard
Modified: 2008-11-03 14:53 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-10-30 17:32:34 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Mark Wielaard 2008-10-27 00:31:50 UTC
Description of problem:

openjdk-devel contains jvisualvm which depends on netbeans-platform8 to run, but the package doesn't depend on it.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel-1.6.0.0-1.1.b12.fc10.i386

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. yum install java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel
2. jvisualvm
  
Actual results:

$ jvisualvm 
/bin/bash: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk/bin/../lib/visualvm//platform*/lib/nbexec: No such file or directory

Expected results:

jvisualvm actually starting.

Additional info:

This is the package that provides nbexec: netbeans-platform8

It might be a good idea to split jvisualvm into its own openjdk-jvisualvm package so openjdk-devel doesn't drag in netbeans.

Comment 1 Lillian Angel 2008-10-27 14:08:16 UTC
Thanks for pointing this out. 

I would rather keep visualvm as a part of the devel package only, instead of creating a subpackage. Any other objections?

Comment 2 Pavol Šimo 2008-11-02 07:30:28 UTC
Yes, I really don't like the netbeans to be installed just because one tool dependency. I think this is really clear example of needing subpackage because of external dependencies.

Comment 3 Lillian Angel 2008-11-03 14:53:04 UTC
Please read the thread here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-October/msg03011.html

Your concerns are addressed. If you have something to add, please reply to the thread.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.