Bug 474405 - condor-low-latency daemon init script should change to reflect new package name
condor-low-latency daemon init script should change to reflect new package name
Product: Red Hat Enterprise MRG
Classification: Red Hat
Component: grid (Show other bugs)
All Linux
low Severity medium
: 1.1.1
: ---
Assigned To: Robert Rati
Jeff Needle
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2008-12-03 12:55 EST by Jeff Needle
Modified: 2009-04-21 12:19 EDT (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: 1.0-8
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2009-04-21 12:19:27 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

External Trackers
Tracker ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHEA-2009:0434 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Red Hat Enterprise MRG Messaging and Grid Version 1.1.1 2009-04-21 12:15:50 EDT

  None (edit)
Description Jeff Needle 2008-12-03 12:55:12 EST
# service condor-low-latency start
Starting Low-Latency daemon:                               [  OK  ]

It would be more consistent if that said:

Starting condor-low-Latency daemon:                        [  OK  ]

Same for stopping.
Comment 1 Robert Rati 2009-01-12 11:32:13 EST
Fixed.  Change will be in:

Comment 2 Jan Sarenik 2009-01-29 04:22:25 EST
Please build the new version of the package so I can verify.
Thank you.
Comment 3 Robert Rati 2009-01-29 16:50:47 EST
1.0-7 had a problem with the init script patch for EL4 so it didn't build on RHEL4.  1.0-8 has been built for both EL5 and EL4.
Comment 4 Jan Sarenik 2009-02-10 03:30:13 EST
rhel4:~# /etc/init.d/condor-low-latency restart
Stopping condor-low-latency daemon:                        [FAILED]
Starting condor-low-latency daemon:                        [  OK  ]

I have tested it on both RHEL5.3 and RHEL4.7 on i386
and as the initscripts are multiarch, I do not consider
important trying it on x86_64 in hope this kind of
thinking is allowed for QE...
Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2009-04-21 12:19:27 EDT
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.