Bug 475471 - Review Request: poi - Java API to Access Microsoft Format Files
Review Request: poi - Java API to Access Microsoft Format Files
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review (Show other bugs)
All Linux
low Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2008-12-09 07:20 EST by Sandro Mathys
Modified: 2009-03-13 10:55 EDT (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2009-03-13 10:54:53 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Sandro Mathys 2008-12-09 07:20:49 EST
Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/poi.spec
SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/poi-3.2-0.1.fc10.src.rpm
Description: The POI project is the master project for developing pure Java ports of file formats based on Microsoft's OLE 2 Compound Document Format. OLE 2 Compound Document Format is used by Microsoft Office Documents, as well as by programs using MFC property sets to serialize their document objects.

rpmlint on spec, srpm and noarch-rpms finishes checking without any warnings or

I'd still need a sponsor.
Comment 1 Sandro Mathys 2008-12-11 20:04:47 EST
mock-(re)build failed due to some junit problem. I'll need some time to look into this.
Comment 2 Mamoru TASAKA 2008-12-15 10:07:04 EST
Comment 3 Sandro Mathys 2008-12-15 23:31:47 EST
Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/poi.spec
SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/poi-3.2-1.fc10.src.rpm

New version including much of the experience I got when my jcalendar pkg was
Comment 4 Sandro Mathys 2008-12-18 17:02:55 EST
Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/poi.spec
SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/poi-3.2-2.fc11.src.rpm

Rebuilt on rawhide. Now using build-jar-repository.
Comment 5 Mamoru TASAKA 2008-12-22 12:46:53 EST
* License issue
  Almost all files are under ASL 2.0, however

  - The following file is under GPLv3
    Would you check how this file is used?

  - The following files have some questionable (?) license
    Would you check how these files are used?

* Preshipped binaries
  - The source zip file contains many preshipped binary files
    such as .xlsx files. Would you remove these files?

* koji build
  - By the way rebuild failed on dist-f11:
Comment 6 Mamoru TASAKA 2009-01-17 11:59:55 EST
Would you update the status of this bug?
Comment 7 Mamoru TASAKA 2009-01-30 10:09:31 EST
ping again?
Comment 8 Mamoru TASAKA 2009-03-09 12:55:34 EDT
I will close this bug if no response is received from the reporter
within ONE WEEK.
Comment 9 Sandro Mathys 2009-03-13 03:44:03 EDT
I apologize, I'm really short in time lately and this will probably not change until the second half of the year. (new job, searching a flat, moving in, a.s.o.)

Therefore, there's no update to this bug, I'm sorry. I know, that it's not a big thing to check with upstream about the licenses and the preshipped binaries (or to answer to this bug earlier) - but unfortunately, several little things add up to a big (i.e. time-consuming) pretty fast.

Anyone's welcome to help here or take this over if they wish to.
Comment 10 Mamoru TASAKA 2009-03-13 10:54:53 EDT
Okay, thank you for the reply anyway.

Now I once close this bug so that someone else can pick
up this review request. If you have some time again to
work with this package, please feel free to open a new
review request for this package.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.