Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/poi.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/poi-3.2-0.1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The POI project is the master project for developing pure Java ports of file formats based on Microsoft's OLE 2 Compound Document Format. OLE 2 Compound Document Format is used by Microsoft Office Documents, as well as by programs using MFC property sets to serialize their document objects. rpmlint on spec, srpm and noarch-rpms finishes checking without any warnings or errors. I'd still need a sponsor.
mock-(re)build failed due to some junit problem. I'll need some time to look into this.
(Removing NEEDSPONSOR)
Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/poi.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/poi-3.2-1.fc10.src.rpm New version including much of the experience I got when my jcalendar pkg was reviewed.
Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/poi.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/poi-3.2-2.fc11.src.rpm Rebuilt on rawhide. Now using build-jar-repository.
* License issue Almost all files are under ASL 2.0, however - The following file is under GPLv3 src/resources/scratchpad/org/apache/poi/hdgf/chunks_parse_cmds.tbl Would you check how this file is used? - The following files have some questionable (?) license terms: src/documentation/content/xdocs/entity/* Would you check how these files are used? * Preshipped binaries - The source zip file contains many preshipped binary files such as .xlsx files. Would you remove these files? * koji build - By the way rebuild failed on dist-f11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1016360
Would you update the status of this bug?
ping again?
I will close this bug if no response is received from the reporter within ONE WEEK.
I apologize, I'm really short in time lately and this will probably not change until the second half of the year. (new job, searching a flat, moving in, a.s.o.) Therefore, there's no update to this bug, I'm sorry. I know, that it's not a big thing to check with upstream about the licenses and the preshipped binaries (or to answer to this bug earlier) - but unfortunately, several little things add up to a big (i.e. time-consuming) pretty fast. Anyone's welcome to help here or take this over if they wish to.
Okay, thank you for the reply anyway. Now I once close this bug so that someone else can pick up this review request. If you have some time again to work with this package, please feel free to open a new review request for this package.