Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 475608
Missing updated gnome-packagekit rpm
Last modified: 2009-01-14 08:46:27 EST
When I tried to update my Fedora/10 on x86-64 on Dec. 9, 2008,
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
gnome-packagekit-0.3.9-8.fc10.x86_64 from installed has depsolving problems
--> Missing Dependency: libpackagekit-glib.so.10()(64bit) is needed by package gnome-packagekit-0.3.9-8.fc10.x86_64 (installed)
Error: Missing Dependency: libpackagekit-glib.so.10()(64bit) is needed by package gnome-packagekit-0.3.9-8.fc10.x86_64 (installed)
i386 is affected as well.
latest posted gnome-packagekit:
latest posted PackageKit-glib
Presumably we need a new gnome-packagekit built against libpackagekit-glib.so.11.
Also -- kpackagekit-0.3.1-4.fc10.x86_64
Update Deps Errors--
libpackagekit-qt.so.10()(64bit) is needed by package kpackagekit-0.3.1-4.fc10.x86_64 : Success - empty transaction
libpackagekit-glib.so.10()(64bit) is needed by package gnome-packagekit-0.3.9-8.fc10.x86_64
Dito for i386:
kpackagekit-0.3.1-4.fc10.i386 from fedora has depsolving problems
--> Missing Dependency: libpackagekit-qt.so.10 is needed by package kpackagekit-0.3.1-4.fc10.i386 (fedora)
Error: Missing Dependency: libpackagekit-qt.so.10 is needed by package kpackagekit-0.3.1-4.fc10.i386 (fedora)
This blocks the installation of KDE using - yum groupinstall "KDE (K Desktop Environment)"
Created attachment 326628 [details]
Output of yum trying to install packages from wrong arch
Something happened with this in the last 24 hours.. Now my system wants to install a TON of i386 packages onto my x86_64 system, and those also fail on deps.
Re: comment #2
A bunch of packages were announced on 2008-Dec-10 as available in updates for Fedora 10. That includes PackageKit-0.3.12-1.fc10, kpackagekit-0.3.1-9.fc10, gnome-packagekit-0.3.12-1.fc10 and others (like glibc-2.9-3, and gimp-2.6.3-2.fc10 and iproute-2.6.27-1.fc10 and more). NONE of corresponding binary rpms so far showed up on mirrors but packages from the next day annoucements are already there. It looks like that the whole batch was lost. Who should be really alarmed here?
I was having similar problems all the way back on 12/7, on both an x86_64 and i386 machine.
The difference was that repeat applications of "yum --skip-broken update" eventually updated everything. Now, with these recent changes, it's back again but I can't get them to play nice.
Today's update fixed this for me..
works for me as well