Bug 477642 - evolution-2.24.2-2.fc10.i386 conflicts with evolution-2.24.2-2.fc10.x86_64
Summary: evolution-2.24.2-2.fc10.i386 conflicts with evolution-2.24.2-2.fc10.x86_64
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: evolution
Version: 10
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Matthew Barnes
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2008-12-22 16:50 UTC by H.J. Lu
Modified: 2008-12-22 17:37 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-12-22 17:15:46 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description H.J. Lu 2008-12-22 16:50:05 UTC 
When I was updating Fedora 10, I got
...
  file /usr/share/locale/zh_HK/LC_MESSAGES/evolution-2.24.mo conflicts between attempted installs of evolution-2.24.2-2.fc10.x86_64 and evolution-2.24.2-2.fc10.i386
  file /usr/share/locale/zh_TW/LC_MESSAGES/evolution-2.24.mo conflicts between attempted installs of evolution-2.24.2-2.fc10.x86_64 and evolution-2.24.2-2.fc10.i386

Error Summary
Comment 1 Matthew Barnes 2008-12-22 17:04:53 UTC 
That's strange.  Is that the only conflicting file?

What does "rpm -q evolution" say?
Comment 2 H.J. Lu 2008-12-22 17:10:56 UTC 
My Fedora 10 was upgraded from Fedora 8 via Fedora 9. It had
both evolution.i386 and evolution.x86-64. I have removed
evolution.i386. Now "yum update" finished OK.
Comment 3 Matthew Barnes 2008-12-22 17:15:46 UTC 
Ah, that would explain it.  Closing as NOTABUG then.
Comment 4 H.J. Lu 2008-12-22 17:19:08 UTC 
If evolution-2.24.2-2.fc10.i386 can't be installed on x86-86, why
is it in x86-64 yum repository?
Comment 5 Matthew Barnes 2008-12-22 17:37:01 UTC 
It can, but I think they're meant to be mutually exclusive.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.