Bug 478894 - remote-configuration tool does not properly process deps for removal
Summary: remote-configuration tool does not properly process deps for removal
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise MRG
Classification: Red Hat
Component: grid
Version: 1.0
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: 1.1
: ---
Assignee: Robert Rati
QA Contact: Jeff Needle
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2009-01-05 21:27 UTC by Robert Rati
Modified: 2009-02-04 16:06 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-02-04 16:06:18 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2009:0036 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Red Hat Enterprise MRG Grid 1.1 Release 2009-02-04 16:03:49 UTC

Description Robert Rati 2009-01-05 21:27:57 UTC
Description of problem:
When removing a feature using the condor_configure_node tool, it doesn't properly handle recursive dependencies.  So, if Feature A is removed, Feature B depends on A, and Feature C depends on B, then only A and B will be removed and not C.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
1.0-10

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Robert Rati 2009-01-05 22:33:04 UTC
The issue was in determining if a dependency existed in a comma separated list of dependencies.  If a feature had only 1 dep then there wasn't a problem.  If a feature had 2 deps (comma separated), then the tool wouldn't process the deps.  This was only an issue when removing a feature.

This will be fixed in 1.0-11

Comment 4 errata-xmlrpc 2009-02-04 16:06:18 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-0036.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.