Bug 479876 - Review Request: yabasic - Small basic interpreter with simple graphics and printing
Review Request: yabasic - Small basic interpreter with simple graphics and pr...
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review (Show other bugs)
rawhide
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
:
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-DEADREVIEW
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2009-01-13 13:51 EST by Fabian Affolter
Modified: 2009-10-02 04:41 EDT (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-06-08 05:26:15 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Fabian Affolter 2009-01-13 13:51:42 EST
Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/yabasic.spec
SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/yabasic-2.763-1.fc9.src.rpm

Project URL: http://www.yabasic.de

Description:
Yabasic implements the most common and simple elements of the basic
language. It comes with for-loops and goto with while-loops and
procedures.  Yabasic does monochrome line graphics, printing comes with
no extra effort.

Koji scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1050066

rpmlint output:
[fab@laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint yabasic*
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

[fab@laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint yabasic-2.763-1.fc9.src.rpm 
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
Comment 1 Jason Tibbitts 2009-03-07 18:30:55 EST
This failed to build for me on rawhide:

checking build system type...
Invalid configuration `x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu': machine `x86_64-redhat' not recognized
configure: error: /bin/sh ./config.sub x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu failed

I'm not really sure what to do about that.
Comment 2 Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-03 19:36:23 EDT
I've seen no reply and this package still doesn't build; I'll close this ticket soon if there's no progress.
Comment 3 Fabian Affolter 2009-06-08 05:26:15 EDT
Sorry, I was a bit short on time in the past weeks.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.