Bug 479933 - mvapich: no fortran90 modules available
mvapich: no fortran90 modules available
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: mvapich (Show other bugs)
x86_64 Linux
low Severity high
: rc
: ---
Assigned To: Doug Ledford
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2009-01-14 02:05 EST by Mehdi Bozzo-Rey
Modified: 2009-09-02 05:51 EDT (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2009-09-02 05:51:27 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

External Trackers
Tracker ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2009:1304 normal SHIPPED_LIVE openib bug fix update 2009-09-01 06:17:40 EDT

  None (edit)
Description Mehdi Bozzo-Rey 2009-01-14 02:05:42 EST
Description of problem: mvapich: no fortran90 modules / can't comile basic fortran90 code

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): rh53 / mvapich-1.1.0-0.2931.3.el5

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1. install mvapich 
2.recompile the fortran90 example
Actual results: fails / can't open module file

Expected results: pass

Additional info:

[root@compute-0-12 ~]# which mpicc
[root@compute-0-12 ~]# cd /usr/lib64/mvapich/1.1.0-gcc/examples/
[root@compute-0-12 examples]# mpif90 pi3f90.f90
 In file pi3f90.f90:22

 use mpi
Fatal Error: Can't open module file 'mpi.mod' for reading at (1): No such file or directory
[root@compute-0-12 examples]#
Comment 1 Doug Ledford 2009-04-22 20:13:39 EDT
This passes with the current mvapich slated for rhel5.4.
Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2009-09-02 05:51:27 EDT
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.