RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 484425 - [LTC 6.0 FEAT] Include jakata-commons-cli 201115
Summary: [LTC 6.0 FEAT] Include jakata-commons-cli 201115
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: distribution
Version: 6.0
Hardware: All
OS: All
low
high
Target Milestone: beta
: 6.0
Assignee: RHEL Program Management
QA Contact: Daniel Riek
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 356741 554559
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2009-02-06 18:10 UTC by IBM Bug Proxy
Modified: 2010-04-26 16:17 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-04-26 16:17:18 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
IBM Linux Technology Center 51533 0 None None None Never

Description IBM Bug Proxy 2009-02-06 18:10:21 UTC 
=Comment: #0=================================================
Emily J. Ratliff <ratliff.com> - 
1. Feature Id: 	201115
Feature Name: 	Include jakata-commons-cli 
Sponsor: 	LTC Systems Mgt
Category: 	Systems management
Request Type: 	Package - Feature from Upstream

2. Short Description: 	Include jakata-commons-cli 
This package is currently included in Fedora since Fedora Core 6.
Architecture Specific ? Purely Common Code
Affects Toolchain ? 	No
Affects Installer ? 	No
Affects Desktop ? 	No
Affects Core Kernel (not mod)?  No
Affects Kernel Module ? No
	
3. Describe the Business Case: 	This file is needed to compile and use the 
WBEM-SMT client originally included in RHEL5.1. Customers have the locate the 
necessary files and install them in the relevant locations. This leads to 
customer dis-satisfaction and the increased chance for support calls if 
customers use the wrong files in the wrong locations. 

Performance Assistance Required?: 	no
	
4. Sponsor Priority: 	2
IBM Confidential: 	no
Code Contribution ?: 	3rd party code
Upstream Acceptance: 	Accepted
Component Release Version Target: 	jakata-commons-cli 1.0

5. Hardware to Red Hat: N/A

6. PM contact:   Sarah Wright, sarahw.com, 503-578-5145

7. Techincal contact: Wolfgang Taphorn, TAPHORN.com, (Boeblingen)
49-7031-16-2753
Comment 1 IBM Bug Proxy 2009-02-06 22:50:26 UTC 
*** Bug 51554 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 IBM Bug Proxy 2009-02-27 22:40:34 UTC 
The preferred version of this is 1.1:

http://commons.apache.org/cli/
Comment 6 Siddharth Nagar 2010-04-26 15:40:11 UTC 
After careful consideration, we have made the decision to not approve this request for including jakarta-commons-cli in RHEL 6.0. In general, these decisions are based on insufficient business justification and lack of relevance to the larger RHEL platform community.
Comment 7 RHEL Program Management 2010-04-26 16:17:18 UTC 
Product Management has reviewed and declined this request.  You may appeal this
decision by reopening this request.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.