Bug 485516 - autofs does not recognize the [no-]slashify-colon option
Summary: autofs does not recognize the [no-]slashify-colon option
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4
Classification: Red Hat
Component: autofs
Version: 4.7
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Jeff Moyer
QA Contact: BaseOS QE
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2009-02-13 21:08 UTC by Jeff Moyer
Modified: 2009-05-18 20:22 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-05-18 20:22:20 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
one liner fix (501 bytes, patch)
2009-02-13 21:08 UTC, Jeff Moyer
no flags Details | Diff


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2009:0991 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE autofs bug fix and enhancement update 2009-05-18 13:50:27 UTC

Description Jeff Moyer 2009-02-13 21:08:10 UTC
Created attachment 331873 [details]
one liner fix

Description of problem:
A master map entry like so:

/test  /etc/auto.test --no-slashify-colons

will generate a warning in the system log stating that no-slashify-colons is an unknown option, when it is actually valid.  This keeps some automounter configurations from working properly, such as CIFS, when specifying a port is necessary, or selinux, when specifying a default file specification.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.1.3-234

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. run automated regression test /CoreOS/autofs/bugzilla/bz249909

Comment 2 Jeff Moyer 2009-03-02 17:33:44 UTC
This bug is fixed in autofs versions 4.1.3-237 and later.

Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2009-05-18 20:22:20 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-0991.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.