Description of problem: Depsolving problems with rhn_solaris_bootstrap when installing 530 nightly (with PyYAML already installed from EPEL). Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Satellite-5.3.0-RHEL5-re20090313.0 How reproducible: 2 of 2 attempts Steps to Reproduce: 1. try to install Satellite Actual results: ---> Package rhn-solaris-bootstrap.noarch 0:5.3.0-5.el5sat set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: rhn_solaris_bootstrap_5_3_0_5 = 1-0.el5sat for package: rhn-solaris-bootstrap --> Finished Dependency Resolution rhn-solaris-bootstrap-5.3.0-5.el5sat.noarch from Satellite/rhn-solaris-bootstrap-5.3.0-5.el5sat.noarch.rpm has de psolving problems --> Missing Dependency: rhn_solaris_bootstrap_5_3_0_5 = 1-0.el5sat is needed by package rhn-solaris-bootstrap-5 .3.0-5.el5sat.noarch (Satellite/rhn-solaris-bootstrap-5.3.0-5.el5sat.noarch.rpm) Error: Missing Dependency: rhn_solaris_bootstrap_5_3_0_5 = 1-0.el5sat is needed by package rhn-solaris-bootstrap- 5.3.0-5.el5sat.noarch (Satellite/rhn-solaris-bootstrap-5.3.0-5.el5sat.noarch.rpm) Expected results: no dependency issues
This is probably the issue: # rpm -ihv /mnt/redhat/devel/candidate-trees/Satellite-5.3.0-RHEL5-re20090313.0/x86_64/x86_64/Satellite/rhn-solaris-bootstrap-5.3.0-5.el5sat.noarch.rpm error: Failed dependencies: rhn_solaris_bootstrap_5_3_0_5 = 1-0.el5sat is needed by rhn-solaris-bootstrap-5.3.0-5.el5sat.noarch
Dennis - I think this should already be addressed, getting Jan's Solaris packages from Friday into this ISO and comps. Cliff
removed from 20090401
Snapshot 20090401 installs ok on both RHEL5 and 4. Thanks.
[root@xen5 rhn]# rpm -q rhn-solaris-bootstrap rhn-solaris-bootstrap-5.3.0-10.el5sat.noarch And no errors during install. Verified in stage on xen5
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2009-1434.html