Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 494831
file displays "for GNU/Linux 2.6.9" message twice
Last modified: 2012-10-31 05:22:53 EDT
Description of problem: The 'file' utility duplicates one part of its output. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): file-4.17-15 dump-debuginfo-0.4b41-4.el5 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: # /usr/bin/file /usr/lib/debug/sbin/rmt.debug /usr/lib/debug/sbin/rmt.debug: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.6.9, statically linked, for GNU/Linux 2.6.9, not stripped # echo $? 0 Actual results: the text "for GNU/Linux 2.6.9" is displayed twice Expected results: the text "for GNU/Linux 2.6.9" is displayed once Additional info:
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion, but this component is not scheduled to be updated in the current Red Hat Enterprise Linux release. If you would like this request to be reviewed for the next minor release, ask your support representative to set the next rhel-x.y flag to "?".
Created attachment 363680 [details] a patch to solve this issue a few adjustments in readelf.c, backported from new upstream version, which behaves correctly
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in the current release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. Because the affected component is not scheduled to be updated in the current release, Red Hat is unfortunately unable to address this request at this time. Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to propose this request, if appropriate and relevant, in the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team. New Contents: Cause: Note field stored in ELF binaries was processed twice. Consequence: File output contained "for GNU/Linux ..." message twice Fix: Note field is processed only once. Result: "for GNU/Linux ..." message is printed only once.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0201.html