Bug 49992 – an entire package tree for one package?

Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.

Bug 49992 - an entire package tree for one package?

Summary:	an entire package tree for one package?

Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE

Aliases:	None

Product:	Red Hat Linux
Classification:	Retired
Component:	distribution (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	7.3
Hardware:	i386 Linux

Priority	low Severity low
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Trond Eivind Glomsrxd
QA Contact:	Brock Organ
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2001-07-25 16:10 EDT by Panic
Modified:	2005-10-31 17:00 EST (History)
CC List:	0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2001-07-25 18:50:29 EDT
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Panic 2001-07-25 16:10:42 EDT

Description of Problem:

Installing from re0725.0.  There is an entire tree branch in the individual
package selection for *one package* -- wl, the lisp imap/pop client for
Emacs.  The tree is Utilities/Text.  This seems a little odd -- either wl
should have some company (aren't there any other text utilities?) or we
should eliminate that branch of the tree.

Or is this just a transition to a new structure?

How Reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. run the installation from the re0725.0 tree, select individual packages
2. Check out the Utilities/Text tree
3. 

Actual Results:

Utilities/Text has only one entry -- the wl package

Expected Results:

wl shouldn't be so lonely.

Additional Information:

Comment 1 Michael Fulbright 2001-07-25 16:50:47 EDT

This is probably a packaging error for the package.

Comment 2 Glen Foster 2001-07-25 18:46:15 EDT

Which package is it?  Name the one and we'll make sure it's fixed.

Comment 3 Trond Eivind Glomsrxd 2001-07-25 18:50:25 EDT

It's "wl" (wanderlust). It's fixed in the package (but not built yet , due to
buildsystem) and in specspo (which overrides the former value anyway) in CVS.

Comment 4 Trond Eivind Glomsrxd 2001-07-25 18:55:26 EDT

The package is now built.

Comment 5 Glen Foster 2001-07-25 19:03:37 EDT

This defect is considered MUST-FIX for Fairfax.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.