Bug 500617 - wrong exclude pattern
Summary: wrong exclude pattern
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora EPEL
Classification: Fedora
Component: mock
Version: el5
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: David Cantrell
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: ActualBug
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2009-05-13 13:26 UTC by Levente Farkas
Modified: 2013-01-10 05:13 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-01-15 16:26:05 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Levente Farkas 2009-05-13 13:26:04 UTC
as i wrote in #500611 mock use wrong exclude pattern in 
/etc/mock/epel-5-x86_64.cfg
currently:
exclude=[0-9A-Za-fh-z]*.i?86 g[0-9A-Za-km-z]*.i?86 gl[0-9A-Za-hj-z]*.i?86 gli[0-9A-Zac-z]*.i?86 glib[0-9A-Za-bd-z]*.i?86
which is not working as we assume so change it to at least:
exclude=[1-9A-Za-fh-z]*.i?86 g[0-9A-Za-km-z]*.i?86 gl[0-9A-Za-hj-z]*.i?86 gli[0-9A-Zac-z]*.i?86 glib[0-9A-Za-bd-z]*.i?86
fix the problem.

Comment 1 Clark Williams 2009-05-13 15:11:06 UTC
What package do you catch changing that zero to a one?

Comment 2 Levente Farkas 2009-05-13 15:33:39 UTC
xen-3.0.3 from updates.
anyway if you read bug #500611 's comment you see yum have to work in this way so it's a bug in mock's config.

Comment 3 Levente Farkas 2009-06-16 16:51:16 UTC
ping?

Comment 4 Clark Williams 2009-06-16 17:34:43 UTC
We haven't forgotten you, just been working on work work (as opposed to mock work). I'll be doing a round of mock fixes in a few days.

Clark

Comment 5 Clark Williams 2009-07-09 01:18:06 UTC
Excludes modified in 0.9.17

Comment 6 Levente Farkas 2009-07-09 16:21:55 UTC
do you plan to issue an epel build too? since i see there are only fedora builds:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=2544

Comment 7 Levente Farkas 2009-07-09 16:25:29 UTC
and as a side not imho this bug is also applies to _all_ fedora version too not just epel-5. what's more i also think it's not the best solution although it's still better the the current exclude pattern.

Comment 8 Clark Williams 2009-07-09 17:07:39 UTC
Not ready to do a EPEL release yet, still trying to figure out how to deal with RPM validation differences.

Comment 9 Levente Farkas 2009-08-13 10:02:32 UTC
any progress?

Comment 10 Levente Farkas 2009-09-08 14:06:00 UTC
waiting for epel version.

Comment 11 Levente Farkas 2010-01-15 16:26:05 UTC
seems to working properly.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.